Interventions to support children’s engagement in health-related decisions: a systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundChildren often need support in health decision-making. The objective of this study was to review characteristics and effectiveness of interventions that support health decision-making of children.MethodsA systematic review. Electronic databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and EMBASE) were searched from inception until March 2012. Two independent reviewers screened eligibility: a) intervention studies; b) involved supporting children (≤18 years) considering health-related decision(s); and c) measured decision quality or decision-making process outcomes. Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted by one author and verified by another using a standardized data extraction form. Quality appraisal was based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.ResultsOf 4313 citations, 5 studies were eligible. Interventions focused on supporting decisions about risk behaviors (n = 3), psycho-educational services (n = 1), and end of life (n = 1). Two of 5 studies had statistically significant findings: i) compared to attention placebo, decision coaching alone increased values congruence between child and parent, and child satisfaction with decision-making process (lower risk of bias); ii) compared to no intervention, a workshop with weekly assignments increased overall decision-making quality (higher risk of bias).ConclusionsFew studies have focused on interventions to support children’s participation in decisions about their health. More research is needed to determine effective methods for supporting children’s health decision-making.

Communication during childhood cancer: Systematic review of patient perspectives

“…[84][85][86] In a Cochrane review regarding shared decision-making interventions for children with cancer, no randomized trials were identifed. [84][85][86] In a Cochrane review regarding shared decision-making interventions for children with cancer, no randomized trials were identifed.…”

Identifying a conceptual shift in child and adolescent-reported treatment decision making: “Having a say, as I need at this time”

“…Recent systematic reviews of pediatric shared treatment decision making (STDM) identify a lack of intervention research directed to including children in STDM . Wyatt et al .…”

Paediatric advance care planning survey: a cross-sectional examination of congruence and discordance between adolescents with HIV/AIDS and their families

“…The focus of pACP needs to be on improving communication between competent adolescent patients and their families, as an initial step towards improving communication with treating physicians to support the youth’s engagement in health-related decisions, especially with regard to the timing of EOL decision making and treatment preferences, the area of greatest discordance 39. Next, pACP needs to become integrated into standard care and mechanisms need to be in place to ensure all interested adolescent patients and their families have access to and provision of pACP prior to a medical crisis 40.…”