2016
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005231.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use

Abstract: Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Nicotine replacement therapy to assist smoking reduction versus placebo, Outcome 2 Cessation at long-term follow-up (subgroups by type of NRT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
85
0
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
(10 reference statements)
4
85
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we were unable to examine differences between non-daily and daily smokers. While evidence suggests that non-daily smokers have increased health risks (Lindson-Hawley et al 2016; Shane, Ling, & Glantz, 2010), non-daily smokers tend to be social or weekend smokers and are less likely to consider themselves “smokers” compared to daily smokers (Shiffman et al 2012). Thus, future studies should include a more extensive measurement of tobacco use behaviors, including couple-level motivators and barriers to smoking cessation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we were unable to examine differences between non-daily and daily smokers. While evidence suggests that non-daily smokers have increased health risks (Lindson-Hawley et al 2016; Shane, Ling, & Glantz, 2010), non-daily smokers tend to be social or weekend smokers and are less likely to consider themselves “smokers” compared to daily smokers (Shiffman et al 2012). Thus, future studies should include a more extensive measurement of tobacco use behaviors, including couple-level motivators and barriers to smoking cessation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, the 2016 Cochrane review of electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation did not address reduction 17. However, people who want to reduce usually want to quit eventually, and there is evidence from a separate Cochrane review that, in people unmotivated to quit, providing NRT to help people initially reduce their cigarette consumption can lead to increased quit rates in the longer term 21. It therefore follows that nicotine-containing e-cigarettes may also be helpful in promoting reduction and abstinence, but the 2016 Cochrane review of tobacco harm reduction interventions included only one small study of e-cigarettes, meaning there was insufficient direct evidence to conclude this 1921…”
Section: How Well Do They Work For Cutting Down?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NRT was also found to be efective for long-term smoking quit in these users (RR 1.87, 95%CI 1.43-2.44); however, the quality of evidence was assessed to be low. here is insuicient evidence at this time for the application of other methods (pharmacological intervention, electronic cigarettes, snus, nicotine patches and low tar cigarettes) in demonstrating a smoking reduction or complete cessation in smokers unwilling or unable to quit (Lindson-Hawley et al, 2016).…”
Section: 'Smoking Reduction' Vs 'Abrupt Cessation'mentioning
confidence: 97%