Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
115
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
115
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our primary outcome was a patient-centered evaluation of informed consent, which was developed based on previous studies [33][34][35][36][37][38] and the following three central informed consent elements: patient-reported understanding of the (1) reasons for and (2) risks of the procedure and (3) having had all questions answered. Specifically, we asked participants the following questions: (1) How well do you understand the reasons you need to have the procedure/surgery?…”
Section: Study Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our primary outcome was a patient-centered evaluation of informed consent, which was developed based on previous studies [33][34][35][36][37][38] and the following three central informed consent elements: patient-reported understanding of the (1) reasons for and (2) risks of the procedure and (3) having had all questions answered. Specifically, we asked participants the following questions: (1) How well do you understand the reasons you need to have the procedure/surgery?…”
Section: Study Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Much more thorough assessments of the content, process, and impact of informed consent could have been very helpful, not only in assessing the impact of the intervention, but in understanding more fully the variety of barriers to achieving informed consent with LEP patients, so that we can more reliably and successfully address them. 6 Several features of the study raise the possibility of both unidentified bias favoring positive results and uncertain generalizability to other settings: its pre/post-evaluation design, the lack of a concurrent control, the limited duration of the study (8 months), and its conduct within a single institution. But these limitations should not distract from the authors' convincing evidence that a simple intervention with nearuniversal generalizability achieved a major improvement in patient experience: dual handset telephones can be installed at any point of care, anywhere in our health system, and can be used for any interactions with patients with limited English proficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study describes preoperative factors that predict a more difficult thyroid operation, and since our definition of a difficult thyroid operation (TDS score >10) was associated with more complications, these factors may predict postoperative complications. Proper informed consent is ethically and legally required for all planned therapies (38); informed consent for a surgery must include the risks, expected benefits and alternatives to treatment, and must also include discussion of the expected postoperative course, including other interventions that may be needed if complications occur (39,40). Since hyperthyroidism, positive antithyroglobulin antibodies and high thyroglobulin are associated with DT, this information should be included during a patient's preoperative counseling, thereby enabling the discussion to be tailored to the individual patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%