Interventions to improve emergency department use for mental health reasons: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review

Abstract

Background Healthcare resources are limited and unnecessary, and inappropriate emergency department use is now a highly visible healthcare priority. Individuals visiting the emergency department for mental health-related reasons are often amongst the most frequent presenters. In response, researchers and clinicians have created interventions to streamline emergency department use and several primary studies describe the effects of these interventions. Yet, no consensus exists on the optimal approach, and information on the quality of development, effectiveness, acceptability, and economic considerations is hard to find. The purpose of this study is to systematically review interventions designed to improve appropriate use of the emergency department for mental health reasons. Method A mixed-method systematic review using Joanna Briggs Methodology. Search combining electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, HealthSTAR, PROQUEST, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health) and secondary searches (grey literature and hand search with consultation). Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts using predetermined eligibility criteria and a third reviewer will resolve conflicts. Full texts will also be screened by two independent reviews and conflicts resolved in a consensus meeting with a third reviewer. A pilot-tested data extraction form will be used to retrieve data relevant to the study objectives. We will assess the quality and of all included studies. Data describing interventions will be summarized using logic models and reported narratively. Quality of development will be assessed using the Oxford Implementation Index. For data on intervention effectiveness, we will assess statistical heterogeneity and conduct a meta-analysis using a random effects method, if appropriate. For interventions that cannot be pooled, we will report outcomes narratively and descriptively. Qualitative data on acceptability will be synthesized using meta-aggregation and an economic evaluation of interventions will be done. The reporting of this protocol follows the PRISMA-P statement. Discussion Using a combined systematic review methodology and integrated knowledge translation plan, the project will provide decision makers with concrete evidence to support the implementation and evaluation of interventions to improve emergency department use for mental health reasons. These interventions reflect widespread priorities in the area of mental health care. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018087430

Revisitando las revisiones sistemáticas desde la perspectiva metodológica

“…Gran parte de los autores de revisiones sistemáticas generaron protocolos, con la finalidad de reducir el solapamiento y la duplicación de la investigación, y, en consecuencia, el despilfarro y la financiación pública (Moher, 2010;Stewart et al, 2012) y los encontramos en todos los ámbitos (Albrecht et al, 2021;Backman et al, 2018;Brown et al, 2022;Chicoine et al, 2021;Johnson et al, 2022;Johnstone et al, 2020;Leslie et al, 2016;Mazevska et al, 2022;Pearson et al, 2021;Rana et al, 2021;Vandyk et al, 2019;Wiafe et al, 2020).…”

Follow the money: Is borderline personality disorder research underfunded in Canada?

“…Nonetheless, several facets of BPD remain under-researched, including several of its diagnostic criteria (e.g., Elsner et al, 2018; Kaufman & Meddaoui, 2021), and ways to reduce its persistent social and vocational impairment (Gunderson et al, 2018). Moreover, although evidence-based treatments for BPD exist (e.g., Bateman & Fonagy, 2004; Clarkin et al, 2007; DeCou et al, 2019; Linehan, 1993; Vogt & Norman, 2019), they are in dire need of optimization as their length and resource intensiveness make them difficult to access (Vandyk et al, 2019) and only approximately half of people respond to them (Woodbridge et al, 2022).…”