Interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis

Abstract

BackgroundReducing meat consumption can help prevent non-communicable diseases and protect the environment. Interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour are generally acceptable approaches to promote dietary change, but little is known about their effectiveness to reduce the demand for meat.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the demand for meat.MethodsWe searched six electronic databases on the 31st of August 2017 with a predefined algorithm, screened publicly accessible resources, contacted authors, and conducted forward and backward reference searches. Eligible studies employed experimental designs to evaluate interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the consumption, purchase, or selection of meat in comparison to a control condition, a baseline period, or relative to other eligible interventions. We synthesised results narratively and conducted an exploratory crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to identify combinations of intervention characteristics associated with significant reductions in the demand for meat.ResultsWe included 24 papers reporting on 59 interventions and 25,477 observations. Self-monitoring interventions and individual lifestyle counselling led to, or were associated with reduced meat consumption. Providing information about the health or environmental consequences of eating meat was associated with reduced intentions to consume and select meat in virtual environments, but there was no evidence to suggest this approach influenced actual behaviour. Education about the animal welfare consequences of eating meat was associated with reduced intentions to consume meat, while interventions implicitly highlighting animal suffering were not. Education on multiple consequences of eating meat led to mixed results. Tailored education was not found to reduce actual or intended meat consumption, though few studies assessed this approach.ConclusionSome interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour have the potential to reduce the demand for meat. In particular, self-monitoring interventions and individual lifestyle counselling can help to reduce meat consumption. There was evidence of effectiveness of some educational messages in reducing intended consumption and selection of meat in virtual environments.Protocol registrationCRD42017076720.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12966-018-0729-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A scoping review of policies promoting and supporting sustainable food systems in the university setting

“…Strategies for reducing meat consumption may need to be less restrictive to increase acceptability [30]. Experimental evidence suggests that nudging interventions that gently encourage consumers to reduce meat may be effective [46]. These include reducing the portion size of meat offered, providing meat alternatives along with educational materials, and changing the sensory properties of meat alternatives that may prove effective at managing demand [46].…”

Reducing meat consumption by appealing to animal welfare: protocol for a meta-analysis and theoretical review

“…Therefore, developing simple, effective interventions to reduce meat consumption could carry widespread societal benefits. Direct appeals regarding individual health may be effective [17], but comparatively little attention has been devoted to appeals regarding animal welfare [17]. However, the nascent literature on the psychology of meat consumption suggests that animal welfare appeals might be particularly promising [18].…”

Impact of increasing vegetarian availability on meal selection and sales in cafeterias

“…Shifting diets to achieve sustainability outcomes is likely to require an array of strategies for changing human behavior (6,7). Education to bring about behavior change is a popular and uncontroversial method; however, while it can raise awareness, it appears to be largely ineffective at actually changing behavior (8,9). Models suggest that taxes on the most polluting foods would result in savings of 1 gigatonne of GHGE worldwide (4), but these taxes can be regressive and are politically unpopular given their lack of public support (8).…”