Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: luxated (dislodged) teeth

Belmonte, Flavia Monari; Day, Peter; Macedo, Cristiane R; Saconato, Humberto; Trevisani, Virgínia Fernandes Moça

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006203

Cited by 5 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Forty‐four SRs had been published in last six years (2015‐2020) 18‐78 . Twenty‐eight of the SRs had been published in Dental Traumatology, 16,17,20‐27,29,30,36,39‐41,44,45,59,60,67,69,71,74,75,77,78 and five were from the Cochrane database 38,46,50,53,70 . The remaining SRs were spread across journals in general dentistry, sports medicine, orthodontics, special care dentistry, endodontics, maxillofacial radiology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, pediatric dentistry, oral sciences, periodontology, community dentistry, epidemiology, dental hygiene, education sciences, and restorative dentistry (Table 3).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the SRs in the domain of Therapeutics, all belonged to the sub‐domain of treatment protocols for the permanent dentition 17,38‐46 . Two of these SRs were Cochrane reviews, 38,46 and three others had been registered in PROSPERO 42‐44 with the number of reviewers ranging from 2 to 7. Three SRs had search limits of language, 40,43,45 and two had restrictions of year and language 41,42 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The domains of Therapeutics and Prognostics are inter‐related and comprised 45.3% of the included SRs 17,38‐65 . It was surprising to observe that within the domain of therapeutics, SRs were identified only in the sub‐domain of treatment protocols for the permanent dentition 17,38‐46 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The absence of SRs in other sub‐domains such as treatment protocols for primary dentition, dentoalveolar trauma, and the combination type of TDI highlights significant gaps in knowledge which should be addressed in future SRs. Two Cochrane SRs in the domain of Therapeutics 38,46 were found to be inconclusive. Inherent ethical and methodological difficulties in performing randomized clinical trials in DT can be the reason for the inconclusiveness of SRs 7 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Twenty-eight of the SRs had been published in Dental Traumatology, 16,17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]29,30,36,[39][40][41]44,45,59,60,67,69,71,74,75,77,78 and five were from the Cochrane database. 38,46,50,53,70 The remaining SRs were spread across journals in general dentistry, sports medicine, F I G U R E 1 The approach of GEM 4 followed in the evidence mapping of systematic reviews in Dental Traumatology Inclusion criteria…”

Section: Re Sultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Evidence mapping and quality assessment of systematic reviews in dental traumatology

Tewari

Mathur

Kaur

et al. 2020

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aims: Evidence mapping of systematic reviews (SRs) systematically and comprehensively identifies, organizes, and summarizes the distribution of scientific evidence in a field. The aims of this study were to delineate domains in dental traumatology (DT), evaluate the existing SRs within the domains, and identify the paucity of evidence for future research. Methods: Domains and sub-domains of DT were established according to the methods of qualitative research. The protocol for evidence mapping was prepared as per the guidelines of GEM and PRISMA. The search strategy was formulated using words and MeSH terms in eight databases without restriction of languages and year of publication. Gray literature, protocol registries, and references of selected articles were also searched. Duplicates were removed, and the final selection of SRs was completed. Data extraction and quality analysis using the ROBIS tool and the PRISMA checklist were performed. Results: The overall search resulted in 64 SRs from 1999 to 2020 with 44 published in last six years. The highest number of SRs had been performed in the Prognostic domain (n = 19) followed by the domains of Epidemiology (n = 15), Therapeutics (n = 10), Oral Biology (n = 7), Diagnostics (n = 6), Preventive (n = 5), and Research Methods (n = 2). Within each domain, there were variabilities in the number of reviewers, a priori protocols, search limitations, risk of bias methods, and meta-analysis. Of the SRs, including 4 Cochrane reviews, 28.4% were inconclusive. A low risk of bias was found in 48.4% of the SRs. Among the registered and ongoing SRs, six were from the domain of epidemiology, two in the domain of therapeutics, five from prognostics, and one each in the domains of prevention and research methods. Conclusion: The SRs in DT could be mapped in seven domains with variabilities in the methods. The majority had an a priori registered protocol and a low risk of reporting errors. Within the Epidemiology and Preventive domains, SRs were present in all the sub-domains with the majority demonstrating low-risk of bias (ROB). The domain of prognosis had SRs in most sub-domains but with a high ROB. Insufficient numbers

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Re Sultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Evidence mapping and quality assessment of systematic reviews in dental traumatology

Tewari

Mathur

Kaur

et al. 2020

Dental Traumatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Atypical extraction treatment for failing replanted maxillary and mandibular incisors with space closure of 2 mandibular incisors in the same quadrant

Schneider-Moser

Moser

2020

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We report the successful orthodontic treatment of a 13-year-old girl who had been involved in an accident with avulsion of her maxillary right central incisor and both mandibular left incisors. Fifteen months after replantation of the teeth, all showed severe root resorption with apical inflammation and had to be extracted. After compensatory removal of the maxillary left central incisor, all 4 extraction sites were closed within 20 months of active orthodontic treatment to avoid implant-prosthodontic replacement. By sequential extraction of the 2 hopeless replanted equilateral mandibular left incisors and common-sense management of straightwire mechanics, it was possible to move the right central incisor across the mandibular midline and close the large space completely. To our knowledge, no case report about orthodontic closure of 2 adjacent extraction spaces in the same quadrant has been published.

show abstract

Anteri̇or Çapraz Kapanişli Olguda Çoklu Dental Travma: İki̇ Yil Taki̇pli̇ Olgu Raporu

KARAALİOĞLU¹,

Bani²,

ÖZTAŞ³

2016

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this case report is to present a case of a patient who had anterior cross-bite and suffered from intrusion and extrusion of maxillary central incisors at the same trauma. An 8-year-old girl was referred to Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, who suffered from slide accident within 1 hours. During clinical examination intrusion of maxillary right central incisor(#11), extrusion of maxillary left central incisor(#21) and anterior crossbite were detected. While considering the multiple trauma, it was decided that repositioning of #21 and waiting for the spontaneous re-eruption of #11 that has open apices, would be the best choice. In addition, teeth were splinted with non-rigid splint. At the 6th month follow-up, loss of vitality and discoloration of #21 was determined. Apexification was indicated. The patient was followed-up for 24 months. The intruded tooth was re-erupted spontaneously in 12 months. Moreover anterior cross-bite was also corrected without any intervention. Apexification of the #21 was shown no symptoms radiographically or clinically throughout the 12th, 18th and 24th month follow-ups. This case report features that the treatment planning of multiple trauma patients and follow-ups should be highlighted to have great importance.

show abstract

Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: luxated (dislodged) teeth

Cited by 5 publications

References 14 publications

Evidence mapping and quality assessment of systematic reviews in dental traumatology

Evidence mapping and quality assessment of systematic reviews in dental traumatology

Atypical extraction treatment for failing replanted maxillary and mandibular incisors with space closure of 2 mandibular incisors in the same quadrant

Anteri̇or Çapraz Kapanişli Olguda Çoklu Dental Travma: İki̇ Yil Taki̇pli̇ Olgu Raporu

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About