2016
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011784.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions for treating oro-antral communications and fistulae due to dental procedures

Abstract: We found very low quality evidence from a single small study that compared pedicled buccal fat pad and buccal flap. The evidence was insufficient to judge whether there is a difference in the effectiveness of these interventions as all oro-antral communications in the study were successfully closed by one month after surgery. Large, well-conducted RCTs investigating different interventions for the treatment of oro-antral communications and fistulae caused by dental procedures are needed to inform clinical prac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
13
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Other causative factors for OAF are dentoalveolar infections, cysts or tumors that invade through maxillary sinus, Paget's disease, trauma and complication of Caldwell-Luc procedure. 1,2,3 Commonly used surgical techniques for closure of OAF are described in the literature including buccal advancement flap, buccal fat pad, palatal island flap and buccal sliding flap 4,5 This report presents a persistent OAF which occurred following lateral sinus lifting procedure; however, closure could not to be managed performing buccal sliding flap, palatal flap and buccal fat pad respectively. Final closure could be accomplished using autogenous septal cartilage graft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2 Other causative factors for OAF are dentoalveolar infections, cysts or tumors that invade through maxillary sinus, Paget's disease, trauma and complication of Caldwell-Luc procedure. 1,2,3 Commonly used surgical techniques for closure of OAF are described in the literature including buccal advancement flap, buccal fat pad, palatal island flap and buccal sliding flap 4,5 This report presents a persistent OAF which occurred following lateral sinus lifting procedure; however, closure could not to be managed performing buccal sliding flap, palatal flap and buccal fat pad respectively. Final closure could be accomplished using autogenous septal cartilage graft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A literatura apresenta várias resoluções cirúrgicas para o tratamento das comunicações bucosinusais baseadas principalmente no tamanho do defeito, tempo de diagnóstico, epitelização do trajeto, presença de infecção no seio maxilar, e tensão necessária para o fechamento por primeira intensão da ferida cirúrgica, não havendo um consenso na efetividade de cada técnica [6][7][8] . Esses fatores mostram a importância de um correto exame clínico e o suporte dos exames de imagem que confirmam o padrão da comunicação.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…O processo de epitelização é evidenciado na cavidade oral no sétimo dia pósoperatório e é completa na 3ª ou 4ª semana por um processo de metaplasia 16 . Estudos mostram altas taxas de sucesso desta técnica, bem como sua variação com a associação a outras camadas durante o fechamento como o retalho vestibular 3,4,7,8,16 . Diante do exposto, o objetivo deste relato de caso é apresentar o fechamento de uma fístula bucosinusal através do retalho pediculado do corpo adiposo bucal abordando diagnóstico e técnica cirúrgica.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Such a technique offers a synergistic advantage by offsetting the drawbacks of the individual techniques—shrinkage with buccal fat pad and tension in flap with buccal advancement. However, there is as yet no consensus on the best technique that is to be used 6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%