Abstract:This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:To determine whether interventions primarily intended to reduce time spent in sedentary behaviour after stroke reduce sedentary time, and whether they modify cardiovascular risk, and reduce the risk of death or secondary vascular events. We will also include interventions intended to reduce the length of prolonged uninterrupted periods of sedentary behaviour (i.e. interventions to fragment or interrupt).
“…In total, the studies included over 22350 participants (two reviews did not report number of participants 24,25 ). Ten reviews were high quality, [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] two moderate, 36,37 three low [38][39][40] and five critically low 24,25,[41][42][43] (supplemental table 2). Nine included a meta-analysis, 25,28,31,32,35,38,41,42,44 of these four were high quality, 28,31,32,35 one moderate quality, 44 one low quality 38 and three critically low quality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten reviews were high quality, [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] two moderate, 36,37 three low [38][39][40] and five critically low 24,25,[41][42][43] (supplemental table 2). Nine included a meta-analysis, 25,28,31,32,35,38,41,42,44 of these four were high quality, 28,31,32,35 one moderate quality, 44 one low quality 38 and three critically low quality. 25,41,42 Fifteen reviews included randomised trials only; the remaining five included a mixture of study designs of interventional studies.…”
Objective Physical activity in people with stroke remains low despite considerable research. This overview aimed to provide high-level synthesis and aid clinical decision-making. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model was used to classify interventions to understand which components improve physical activity behaviour in people with stroke. Data Sources CINAHL, Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, PEDro, PsychINFO, SPORTDiscus Review Methods A systematic search was conducted (November 2023) to identify reviews of interventions to improve physical activity in people with stroke. Results were screened and assessed for eligibility. Participant characteristics, intervention classification using COM-B, and effect of intervention were extracted. Quality was assessed using AMSTAR2, and Corrected Cover Analysis for study overlap. Narrative synthesis was used to understand components of interventions to improve physical activity behaviour. Results 1801 references were screened and 29 full-text references assessed for eligibility. Twenty reviews were included. Quality ranged from critically low ( n = 3) to high ( n = 10). Study overlap calculated using corrected cover area indicated slight overlap (0.028) and minimal reporting bias. The majority of participants were mobile with mild stroke and community dwelling. Twenty-three interventions were classified using COM-B. Three of twelve interventions classified to one aspect of the COM-B were effective. Fourteen of sixteen effective interventions combined at least two COM-B elements, ten of these combined capability and motivation. Conclusion Interventions including at least two elements of the COM-B are most likely to improve physical activity in mobile stroke survivors. Further research is needed to understand physical activity behaviour in those with moderate to severe stroke.
“…In total, the studies included over 22350 participants (two reviews did not report number of participants 24,25 ). Ten reviews were high quality, [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] two moderate, 36,37 three low [38][39][40] and five critically low 24,25,[41][42][43] (supplemental table 2). Nine included a meta-analysis, 25,28,31,32,35,38,41,42,44 of these four were high quality, 28,31,32,35 one moderate quality, 44 one low quality 38 and three critically low quality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten reviews were high quality, [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] two moderate, 36,37 three low [38][39][40] and five critically low 24,25,[41][42][43] (supplemental table 2). Nine included a meta-analysis, 25,28,31,32,35,38,41,42,44 of these four were high quality, 28,31,32,35 one moderate quality, 44 one low quality 38 and three critically low quality. 25,41,42 Fifteen reviews included randomised trials only; the remaining five included a mixture of study designs of interventional studies.…”
Objective Physical activity in people with stroke remains low despite considerable research. This overview aimed to provide high-level synthesis and aid clinical decision-making. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model was used to classify interventions to understand which components improve physical activity behaviour in people with stroke. Data Sources CINAHL, Cochrane Database, MEDLINE, PEDro, PsychINFO, SPORTDiscus Review Methods A systematic search was conducted (November 2023) to identify reviews of interventions to improve physical activity in people with stroke. Results were screened and assessed for eligibility. Participant characteristics, intervention classification using COM-B, and effect of intervention were extracted. Quality was assessed using AMSTAR2, and Corrected Cover Analysis for study overlap. Narrative synthesis was used to understand components of interventions to improve physical activity behaviour. Results 1801 references were screened and 29 full-text references assessed for eligibility. Twenty reviews were included. Quality ranged from critically low ( n = 3) to high ( n = 10). Study overlap calculated using corrected cover area indicated slight overlap (0.028) and minimal reporting bias. The majority of participants were mobile with mild stroke and community dwelling. Twenty-three interventions were classified using COM-B. Three of twelve interventions classified to one aspect of the COM-B were effective. Fourteen of sixteen effective interventions combined at least two COM-B elements, ten of these combined capability and motivation. Conclusion Interventions including at least two elements of the COM-B are most likely to improve physical activity in mobile stroke survivors. Further research is needed to understand physical activity behaviour in those with moderate to severe stroke.
“…5 A Cochrane systematic review presented trials to reduce sedentary behavior after stroke, with the majority of interventions monitoring physical activity with an accelerometer as an outcome measure. 6 Of importance, a recent study with minor stroke demonstrated that technology alone may be insufficient for changing behavior. 7 In this randomized controlled trial, 2 groups of stroke patients were provided with an accelerometer to self-monitor step-counts during hospitalization and for 3 months after.…”
“…The primary objectives of this review 1 were to determine whether interventions designed to reduce sedentary behavior after stroke, or interventions with the potential to do so, can reduce the risk of death or secondary vascular events, modify cardiovascular risk, and reduce sedentary behavior.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.