2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions for Radiation-Induced Fibrosis in Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our second most downloaded article, from Chan et al, also focused on breast cancer and was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on radiation-induced fibrosis after breast radiation. The authors suggested that “[a]lthough isolated studies show significant results favorable to the experimental groups, caution should be exercised in these findings because of the small number, small sample size, and high risk of bias presented by some of the included studies, which makes the recommendation for clinical practice still weak.” 2 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our second most downloaded article, from Chan et al, also focused on breast cancer and was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on radiation-induced fibrosis after breast radiation. The authors suggested that “[a]lthough isolated studies show significant results favorable to the experimental groups, caution should be exercised in these findings because of the small number, small sample size, and high risk of bias presented by some of the included studies, which makes the recommendation for clinical practice still weak.” 2 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combined use of vitamin E and pentoxifylline, a methylxanthine derivative, has shown promising results [ 16 , 17 ]. A 2022 meta-analysis was unable to determine the effectiveness of pentoxifylline and vitamin E [ 18 ]. Autologous fat grafting has demonstrated promise in preclinical and clinical settings for post-radiation damage [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgeries, such as sentinel lymph node biopsy, lumpectomy, quadrantectomy, and modified radical mastectomy, with or without axillary lymph node dissection, can cause pain, postural impairments, neck mobility, upper limb anatomy, and upper body biomechanical functions. The main negative side effects are breast cancer-related lymphedema and shoulder mobility limitations, including scapula and scapulohumeral rhythm [1], which are negatively influenced by both chemotherapy [2] and radiation therapy [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, fibrosis is a common and disabling condition characterized by the abnormal formation of fibrous connective tissue leading to structural and functional changes affecting the skin, underlying fascia, muscles, organs, and bones. These result in decreased joint range of motion, mainly of the shoulder, pain, lymphatic and vascular dysfunction, as well as breast hardening, retraction, and fixation [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%