2014
DOI: 10.3310/hta18460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions for adult Eustachian tube dysfunction: asystematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
141
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
141
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several studies showing no effect of decongestants on ET function in patients with middle ear diseases (29,30). Besides intranasal decongestant therapy, other active pharmaceutical ingredients had been investigated by other authors for their potential to improve ET function (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies showing no effect of decongestants on ET function in patients with middle ear diseases (29,30). Besides intranasal decongestant therapy, other active pharmaceutical ingredients had been investigated by other authors for their potential to improve ET function (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some mechanistic insight is gained from the correlation analysis which showed that the blood-pressure and ME responses were independent and by simple calculations documenting extremely dilute blood oxymetazoline concentrations even if the locally applied dose was completely absorbed. More reasonably, the ME effects of topical intranasal drug delivery represents a broad response of the continuous nasal-ET-ME mucosa to a localized stimulus, an effect presumed by those who recommend topical nasal decongestants to improve or prevent situational ET dysfunction 21-23 . That mechanism is also supported by empirical data for monkey experiments documenting changes in certain measures of ME mucosal blood perfusion after exposing the nasal mucosa to inflammatory substances 13,14 and is predicted by the “Unified Airway” theory 15,16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria used were adapted from the assessment of controlled studies and criteria used in a previous systematic review. 33 Assessment of risk of bias was undertaken independently by two researchers (except for non-English-language studies). Discrepancies were resolved by discussion.…”
Section: Assessment Of Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%