2020
DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventions and strategies to prevent catheter‐associated urinary tract infections with short‐term indwelling urinary catheters in hospitalized patients: An integrative review

Abstract: Aim: To explore interventions and strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients with a short-term indwelling urinary catheter.Background: Interventions and strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections are reported in the literature, but it is not clear which may be relevant when the indwelling urinary catheter is in place for a short period of time.Design: An integrative review was performed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale adopts a percentage system, with >90 being very satisfied, 76-90 being satisfied, 60-75 being dissatisfied, and <60 being very dissatisfied. (7) The knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) scale for prevention of catheter infection and the evaluation scale of nurses ability were used to evaluate the sense of control ability and core ability of nurses. The KAP scale for prevention of catheter infection included four dimensions including attitude, behavior, indication of catheter placement, and infection prevention strategy and it consisted of 71 items, with 1-5 points for each item.…”
Section: Observation Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scale adopts a percentage system, with >90 being very satisfied, 76-90 being satisfied, 60-75 being dissatisfied, and <60 being very dissatisfied. (7) The knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) scale for prevention of catheter infection and the evaluation scale of nurses ability were used to evaluate the sense of control ability and core ability of nurses. The KAP scale for prevention of catheter infection included four dimensions including attitude, behavior, indication of catheter placement, and infection prevention strategy and it consisted of 71 items, with 1-5 points for each item.…”
Section: Observation Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improper catheterization will damage the urethra and bladder mucosa and long-term indwelling will weaken the function of detrusor. Urine calcium salt deposition will block the urinary catheter, resulting in urine leakage and damage to the natural defense barrier of the urinary tract, causing bacterial colonization or infection (7). At present, care of clinical nurses for indwelling urinary catheter is still based on Basic Nursing Science, but there are still differences in nursing measures such as selection of urinary catheter of different departments and materials, frequency of urine bag replacement, timing of catheter removal, and evaluation and rehabilitation of bladder function after catheter removal, which have resulted in long time of indwelling urinary catheter in some patients, increased probability of urethral injury and infection, and deepened doctor-patient contradiction (8,9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including device checklists and templates in electronic records has demonstrated marked improvements in prompt vascular access and urinary catheter removal in several studies (Aufricht et al, 2019;Shadle et al, 2021;Tarrago et al, 2014). Documentation of device decisions should be incorporated into electronic medical records, with automated stop orders, as appropriate (Yu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Document Your Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation studies of multimodal bundles, including daily prompts of device necessity, have achieved reduction in utilization of IUCs (Gazarin et al, 2020;Giles et al, 2020;Kuriyama et al, 2019;Niederhauser et al, 2019;Schweiger et al, 2020), CVADs (Kara et al, 2016;Kleinman Sween et al, 2021;Walz et al, 2015;Xiong & Chen, 2018), CVADs and IUCs (Chandramohan et al, 2018;Kaminski et al, 2021;Mena Lora et al, 2020), IUCs and PIVCs (Laan et al, 2020), andPIVCs (Egerton-Warburton et al, 2019;Mestre et al, 2013;Yagnik et al, 2017). Interventions that employ education, daily reminders, and automated stop-orders demonstrate greater clinician awareness of device use and prompt removal of unnecessary devices, with subsequent reductions in complications and infections (Kleinman Sween et al, 2021;Meddings et al, 2020;Mitchell et al, 2019;Yu et al, 2020), but continued vigilance is crucial (Chandramohan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permanent transurethral catheterisation with a Foley catheter is a widely used procedure both in hospitals and in the community, but is not without complications, the development of urinary tract infections (UTI) being the most frequent one 2 . The prevalence of UTI has been noted to be present in 80% of people with a catheter 1,3 and it is suggested that the bacterial colonization rate reaches an incidence of up to 95%, 4 weeks after insertion 4 . Other complications can include catheter obstruction, pericatheter leakage, bladder spasms, and trauma to the urethra or bladder endothelium, which can lead to perilesional stenosis 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%