2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2019.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interventional Therapies in Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The in-hospital mortality rates vary from 3% to 15% despite contemporary treatments. 2 In our cohort of intermediate-risk PE patients, the prevalence of normotensive shock was high (62%). This rate is higher than that in the FLASH registry (34%), suggesting perhaps selection of a higher risk cohort by the local PE response team to undergo MT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The in-hospital mortality rates vary from 3% to 15% despite contemporary treatments. 2 In our cohort of intermediate-risk PE patients, the prevalence of normotensive shock was high (62%). This rate is higher than that in the FLASH registry (34%), suggesting perhaps selection of a higher risk cohort by the local PE response team to undergo MT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…All patients undergoing MT underwent invasive hemodynamic evaluation. Normotensive shock was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg in the absence of vasopressor support with preprocedural invasive measures of CI ≤2.2 L/min per m 2 and clinical evidence of hypoperfusion (ie, elevated lactate, oliguria). The study was approved by the New York University institutional review board, and the procedures followed were in accordance with institutional guidelines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modality has been shown to be more effective than anticoagulation alone in restoring vessel patency and more rapidly reversing the acute hemodynamic sequelae of PE. While head‐to‐head randomized trials are sparse, observational data suggests a lower risk of major bleeding with CDT compared to systemic thrombolysis 6–8 . Although other cardiovascular procedures have demonstrated an inverse association between procedural volume and outcomes, 9–11 the association between CDT hospital volume and in‐hospital clinical outcomes remains largely unknown despite growing interest in the procedure 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While head-to-head randomized trials are sparse, observational data suggests a lower risk of major bleeding with CDT compared to systemic thrombolysis. [6][7][8] Although other cardiovascular procedures have demonstrated an inverse association between procedural volume and outcomes, [9][10][11] the association between CDT hospital volume and in-hospital clinical outcomes remains largely unknown despite growing interest in the procedure. 12 The objective of this study was to examine the association between hospital volume of CDT for pulmonary embolism and in-hospital clinical outcomes using a national representative database.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 ] It has been estimated that only 7% of the patients with PE who died were correctly diagnosed before death. [ 2 ] Genetic abnormalities in proteins involved in the coagulation pathway leading to hypercoagulability have been found to be the cause of thrombophilia disease. Factor V Leiden (FV Leiden) and prothrombin G20210A gene mutations are highly prevalent in the Caucasian population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%