Interventional Pain Management Skills Competency in Pain Medicine Fellows

Abstract

The purposes of this project were to propose an educational module to instruct pain medicine fellows in the appropriate performance of interventional pain management techniques and to verify procedural competency through objective evaluation methodology. Eight board-certified pain medicine physicians spanning two fellowship programs trained seven fellows using a standardized competency-based module. Assessment tools address the basic competencies outlined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (American Board of Anesthesiology Pain Medicine Content Outline). The seven fellows demonstrated proficiency in every segment of the evaluation module. Objective measures compared the fellows' performance on standardized procedure checklists administered 9 mos into training; fellows in the 2012-2013 academic year also received testing at the 3-mo mark. Support for the assessment module is demonstrated by appropriate performance of interventional procedures, with improvement noted from 3-mo to 9-mo testing, successful completion of chart-stimulated oral examinations, proper performance of relevant physical examination maneuvers, and completion of program-specific medical knowledge written tests. The fellows were evaluated via patient surveys and 360-degree global rating scales, maintained procedure logs, and completed two patient-care reports; these were reviewed by program directors to ensure adequate completion. The standardized educational module and evaluation methodology presented provide a potential framework for the definition of baseline competency in the clinical skill area of interventional pain management.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Hands-on vs. Observational Training of Residents in Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections (ILESI) Using a High-Fidelity Spine Simulator

“…This is a field that requires proficiency in interventional pain procedures. Additionally for PM&R residents, there are ACGME requirements for exposure to interventional pain procedures [1,2,8,[9][10][11][12]. Despite these factors, the ideal method of teaching relevant procedures during PM&R residency training has not been examined closely.…”

Interventional Spine and Pain Procedure Credentialing: Guidelines from the American Society of Pain & Neuroscience

“…The key opinion leaders in each specialty will need to work closely with industry partners to better define all aspects of such an endeavors for the present and well into the future. 15 , 16 Three tenets to consider for the rollout of any new technology: Obtain the highest level of evidence on safety, appropriateness, costs, and effectiveness of any particular novel device. It is incumbent upon industry and physicians to understand these data and their limitations.…”

“…The key opinion leaders in each specialty will need to work closely with industry partners to better define all aspects of such an endeavors for the present and well into the future. 15,16 Three tenets to consider for the rollout of any new technology:…”

Postoperative Analgesia Following Sciatic Nerve Blockade Administered by Nurse Anesthetists Supervised by Regional Anesthesia Faculty in an Academic Hospital

“…Small numbers of procedural observations on large numbers of trainees have been reported as a source of methodological bias [26]. Reduction of the bias effects of small sample size, nonrandom selection of practitioner and nerve block technique, and trainee cohort variability in training has been attempted by the employment of multiple standard observers and protocols [27].…”