Intervention to Promote Communication About Goals of Care for Hospitalized Patients With Serious Illness

Abstract

ImportanceDiscussions about goals of care are important for high-quality palliative care yet are often lacking for hospitalized older patients with serious illness.ObjectiveTo evaluate a communication-priming intervention to promote goals-of-care discussions between clinicians and hospitalized older patients with serious illness.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA pragmatic, randomized clinical trial of a clinician-facing communication-priming intervention vs usual care was conducted at 3 US hospitals within 1 health care system, including a university, county, and community hospital. Eligible hospitalized patients were aged 55 years or older with any of the chronic illnesses used by the Dartmouth Atlas project to study end-of-life care or were aged 80 years or older. Patients with documented goals-of-care discussions or a palliative care consultation between hospital admission and eligibility screening were excluded. Randomization occurred between April 2020 and March 2021 and was stratified by study site and history of dementia.InterventionPhysicians and advance practice clinicians who were treating the patients randomized to the intervention received a 1-page, patient-specific intervention (Jumpstart Guide) to prompt and guide goals-of-care discussions.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was the proportion of patients with electronic health record–documented goals-of-care discussions within 30 days. There was also an evaluation of whether the effect of the intervention varied by age, sex, history of dementia, minoritized race or ethnicity, or study site.ResultsOf 3918 patients screened, 2512 were enrolled (mean age, 71.7 [SD, 10.8] years and 42% were women) and randomized (1255 to the intervention group and 1257 to the usual care group). The patients were American Indian or Alaska Native (1.8%), Asian (12%), Black (13%), Hispanic (6%), Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (0.5%), non-Hispanic (93%), and White (70%). The proportion of patients with electronic health record–documented goals-of-care discussions within 30 days was 34.5% (433 of 1255 patients) in the intervention group vs 30.4% (382 of 1257 patients) in the usual care group (hospital- and dementia-adjusted difference, 4.1% [95% CI, 0.4% to 7.8%]). The analyses of the treatment effect modifiers suggested that the intervention had a larger effect size among patients with minoritized race or ethnicity. Among 803 patients with minoritized race or ethnicity, the hospital- and dementia-adjusted proportion with goals-of-care discussions was 10.2% (95% CI, 4.0% to 16.5%) higher in the intervention group than in the usual care group. Among 1641 non-Hispanic White patients, the adjusted proportion with goals-of-care discussions was 1.6% (95% CI, −3.0% to 6.2%) higher in the intervention group than in the usual care group. There was no evidence of differential treatment effects of the intervention on the primary outcome by age, sex, history of dementia, or study site.Conclusions and RelevanceAmong hospitalized older adults with serious illness, a pragmatic clinician-facing communication-priming intervention significantly improved documentation of goals-of-care discussions in the electronic health record, with a greater effect size in racially or ethnically minoritized patients.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04281784

Goals-of-Care Conversations After Stroke Survival

“…3 The use of the Jumpstart guide in hospitalized patients increased GOCC documentation, with a larger effect size among racially and ethnically minoritized patients. 1 Additional work is needed to implement and assess the efficacy of this guide in this unique population.…”

Video Intervention and Goals-of-Care Documentation in Hospitalized Older Adults

“…For many individuals and especially those from racial and ethnic communities disproportionally impacted by COVID-19, GOC discussions are real and no longer hypothetical. To date, the VIDEO-PCE trial is the third published large pragmatic trial since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic to suggest that GOC interventions can be designed that engage Black or African American and Hispanic or Latino patients in GOC conversations . Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, GOC discussions may be more salient, especially for individuals from communities that have been disproportionally impacted by COVID-19.…”

Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes

“…Structured communication tools improve the quality of communication, patient involvement, and documentation of patient wishes and treatment plans. [50][51][52] Staff need to be supported with training in the use of such tools, and recommendations should be recorded to ensure that these decisions are accessible and transferrable within and between care settings. If organ donation is appropriate, ensure trained staff handle the interface with the patient's family and the treatment team is made aware.…”