2022
DOI: 10.1017/s096077732200073x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intervention, Return, and Reinterpretation: The Jasenovac Memorial Museum Collection, 1991–2006

Abstract: This article recalls an important episode in the history of Jasenovac Memorial Museum (JMM). It traces the formative process through which the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM) and US Department of State intervened to retrieve the Jasenovac collection from Banja Luka in 2000, acted as its temporary guardian until returning it to Croatia in 2001, and continued to assist JMM with its creation of a new permanent exhibition. Situating this moment in the site's history at the intersection of Yugoslavi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But our analyses have again foregrounded the issue on Serbian vs. Nazi suffering without analyzing what happened to Jews specifically as a result of Nedić’s decision to collaborate. Numerous articles have analyzed the reinterpretation of the Jasenovac narrative, which Serbia uses to place itself as ultimate victim and Jews simply one other group that suffered during the Nazi occupation (victims of concentration camps as typically described as “Serbs, Jews and Roma”), and Croatia has used it to absolve itself of responsibility by reinterpreting it as “victims of fascism” instead of “victims of Croatia” (Pavlaković 2019; Zaremba 2022). Yet no research has focused on the memory of the Staro Sajmište concentration camp, where the primary victims were Jews (Bajford 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But our analyses have again foregrounded the issue on Serbian vs. Nazi suffering without analyzing what happened to Jews specifically as a result of Nedić’s decision to collaborate. Numerous articles have analyzed the reinterpretation of the Jasenovac narrative, which Serbia uses to place itself as ultimate victim and Jews simply one other group that suffered during the Nazi occupation (victims of concentration camps as typically described as “Serbs, Jews and Roma”), and Croatia has used it to absolve itself of responsibility by reinterpreting it as “victims of fascism” instead of “victims of Croatia” (Pavlaković 2019; Zaremba 2022). Yet no research has focused on the memory of the Staro Sajmište concentration camp, where the primary victims were Jews (Bajford 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%