2009
DOI: 10.1002/ddrr.67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intervention for individuals with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: Treatment approaches and case management

Abstract: Exposure to alcohol in utero is considered to be the leading cause of developmental disabilities of known etiology. The most severe consequence of such exposure, fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), is characterized by a distinct constellation of characteristic facial anomalies, growth retardation, and central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction. Some individuals with prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) do not meet the full criteria for FAS, but instead are diagnosed with partial FAS, alcohol related neurodevelopmental diso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(77 reference statements)
1
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, FASD constitutes a serious health problem in the United States and worldwide. Notwithstanding the seriousness of the problem, there is a scarcity of empirically supported interventions for FASDs (Kalberg and Buckley 2007;Paley and O'Connor 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, FASD constitutes a serious health problem in the United States and worldwide. Notwithstanding the seriousness of the problem, there is a scarcity of empirically supported interventions for FASDs (Kalberg and Buckley 2007;Paley and O'Connor 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know that infants who were exposed to any level of alcohol inutero are at increased risk for alcohol related damage including characteristic facial features, congenital heart defects, and mental and behavioral abnormalities [2,3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They described a hope for their youth to achieve their fullest potential, to be included, and to feel good about themselves. The literature, in contrast, placed emphasis on deficits (e.g., Kully-Martens et al 2012) and skill development (e.g., Kalberg and Buckley 2007), potential social and legal problems (e.g., Mela and Luther 2013), and interventions (e.g., Paley and O'connor 2009) for children and youth. While this difference in perspectives can be viewed as inconsistent and potentially in conflict, it also offers an opportunity to view these contrasting views as complementary.…”
Section: Upport Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%