Intervention Fidelity

Santacroce, Sheila Judge; Maccarelli, Lisa M.; Grey, Margaret

doi:10.1097/00006199-200401000-00010

Cited by 168 publications

(188 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

177

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, protocol adaptation needs to be systematic, carefully considered, and adequately described [42]. In addition, program fidelity needs to be systematically evaluated in translational research, particularly with complex behavioral interventions [43]. Program adaptation and fidelity were not adequately described in most studies of this review.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of the translational research on the Diabetes Prevention Program

Whittemore

2011

Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res.

141

156

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International clinical trials have demonstrated compelling evidence on the prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes (T2D) by lifestyle change programs. Numerous studies have translated the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) protocol to "real-world" settings. The purpose of this paper is to review the translational research of the DPP protocol in adults at-risk for T2D. This study is a systematic review based on the guidelines from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. There were 16 studies that translated the DPP protocol in four distinct settings: (a) hospital outpatient, (b) primary care, (c) community, and (d) work and church. Settings varied considerably in terms of reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. There were strengths and limitations to each setting. Better understanding of program adaptation and mediators and moderators to program efficacy are indicated. Future research also needs to continue to explore mechanisms to improve access and long-term outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of the translational research on the Diabetes Prevention Program

Whittemore

2011

Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res.

141

156

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…72 The use of present/absent checklists has been identified as the most reliable method to monitor the fidelity of delivery of study interventions. 72,74,75 Key to this method is the prespecified intervention content or 'treatment manual', a manual containing explicit guidelines about the content and method of delivery of an intervention to ensure that all providers receive the same training and information. In addition to identifying the extent of fidelity of delivery, it is also important to understand the 'essential' components of an intervention.…”

Section: Process Evaluation and Subsidiary Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Start2quit: a randomised clinical controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using personal tailored risk information and taster sessions to increase the uptake of the NHS Stop Smoking Services

Gilbert

Sutton

Morris

et al. 2017

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full HTA archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Health Technology Assessment journalReports are published in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) if (1) they have resulted from work for the HTA programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors.Reviews in Health Technology Assessment are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. HTA programmeThe HTA programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 1993. It produces high-quality research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined as all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care.The journal is indexed in NHS Evidence via its abstracts included in MEDLINE and its Technology Assessment Reports inform National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. HTA research is also an important source of evidence for National Screening Committee (NSC) policy decisions.For more information about the HTA programme please visit the website: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hta This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 08/58/02. The contractual start date was in June 2010. The draft report began editorial review in December 2015 and was accepted for publication in June 2016. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HTA programme or the Department of Health. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors, those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HTA programme or the Department of Health. © Queen's Printer a...

show abstract

“…In turn, greater precision should strengthen the intervention and promote consistency of its implementation in future studies (Santacroce, Maccarelli, & Grey, 2004). Increasing the precision and specificity of an intervention can better demonstrate differences that might exist within groups and between experimental and control groups and reduce unexplained variance (Lipsey, 1990).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Qualitative research contribution to a randomized clinical trial

Schumacher

Koresawa

West

et al. 2005

Research in Nursing & Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Qualitative research may be combined fruitfully with intervention studies, but few examples provide detailed methodological strategies for doing so. In this article, we describe the qualitative component of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) of the PRO-SELF ß Pain Control Program, an intervention that provides individualized education, coaching, and support for cancer pain management. We conducted three qualitative analyses of verbatim transcripts of ''real-time'' audiotaped intervention sessions. As a result, we were better able to ascertain the nature of the individualized coaching component of the intervention, patient and family caregiver use of selected intervention tools, and reasons the intervention did not work for some patients. Study results were used to increase the specificity with which the coaching portion of the intervention is described in the intervention protocol.

show abstract

Intervention Fidelity

Abstract: Application of the Technology Model of intervention fidelity could advance the maturation of nursing intervention research and evidence-based clinical practice.

Cited by 168 publications

References 15 publications

A systematic review of the translational research on the Diabetes Prevention Program

A systematic review of the translational research on the Diabetes Prevention Program

Start2quit: a randomised clinical controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using personal tailored risk information and taster sessions to increase the uptake of the NHS Stop Smoking Services

Qualitative research contribution to a randomized clinical trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About