2018
DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intervention effects in NPI licensing: A quantitative assessment of the scalar implicature explanation

Abstract: This paper reports on five experiments investigating intervention effects in negative polarity item (NPI) licensing. Such intervention effects involve the unexpected ungrammaticality of sentences that contain an intervener, such as a universal quantifier, in between the NPI and its licensor. For example, the licensing of the NPI any in the sentence *Monkey didn't give every lion any chocolate is disrupted by intervention. Interveners also happen to be items that trigger scalar implicatures in environments in w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, for each of these pairs of sentences, we created items for which, in the premise, there was (i) no PI (for all environments), (ii) an NPI for DE and NM environments, (iii) a PPI for UE and NM environments. These possibilities correspond to all possibilities that may not be outrageously unacceptable (see discussions about the marginal acceptability of some PIs in NM environments in Rothschild, 2006, Crnič, 2014, and a quantitative evaluation in Chemla et al, 2011 andDenić et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, for each of these pairs of sentences, we created items for which, in the premise, there was (i) no PI (for all environments), (ii) an NPI for DE and NM environments, (iii) a PPI for UE and NM environments. These possibilities correspond to all possibilities that may not be outrageously unacceptable (see discussions about the marginal acceptability of some PIs in NM environments in Rothschild, 2006, Crnič, 2014, and a quantitative evaluation in Chemla et al, 2011 andDenić et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Importantly for our purposes, both PPIs and NPIs are known to be acceptable at least to a certain extent in these environments: both (8a) and (8b) can be interpreted as (7a) (there is however some individual variation in terms of NPI acceptability in NM environments, cf. Rothschild, 2006, Crnič, 2014, Chemla et al, 2011, Denić, Chemla, & Tieu, 2018.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Pis Affect the Perception Of Monotonicitymentioning
confidence: 99%