1996
DOI: 10.1080/000368496327831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intervention analysis with cointegrated time series: the case of the Hawaii hotel room tax

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar conclusion was obtained by Mak (1981); Bonham and Gangnes (1996) which finds no statistically significant impact of the room tax on room revenues. According to the authors since the tax is added to room bills on checkout it may not be visible to the tourist when planning a vacation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A similar conclusion was obtained by Mak (1981); Bonham and Gangnes (1996) which finds no statistically significant impact of the room tax on room revenues. According to the authors since the tax is added to room bills on checkout it may not be visible to the tourist when planning a vacation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…However, a later study using panel data until 2003 to analyze tourism demand to the Balearic Islands, did not find a significant effect of the ecotax on the number of arrivals (Garín-Muñoz and Montero-Martín, 2007). Other studies analyzing the impact of the 5% Hawaii hotel room tax (which generated in $82 million of revenue in 1990, making it the third largest source of state revenue) did not find a statistically significant impact on visitors (Bonham and Gangnes, 1996). Thus, if the number of tourists is not greatly influenced by the ecotax and the amount that can be raised per tourist is not completely crowded-out by the ecotax, then such a policy may prove a valid way to raise funds for environmental protection and remediation.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taxes in tourism (not only environmental taxes) are very appealing for public agencies, since they shift a portion of the local tax burden from residents to tourists (who are not voters in the region), without imposing a substantial negative burden on the local tourism industry (Bonham and Gangnes, 1996). Other fundraising mechanisms such as voluntary donations (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that its purpose was not to internalize negative external costs to the environment, it cannot be considered as an environmental tax. 6 The study included 14 origin countries: United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Portugal, Norway, Belgium, Ireland, Netherlands, Denmark, Austria, Sweden, Switzerland and Finland. hotel room tax (which generated in $82 million of revenue in 1990, making it the third largest source of state revenue) which did not find a statistically significant impact on visitors (Bonham and Gangnes, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%