Humanitarian Intervention: A History
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511921292.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intervening in the Jewish question, 1840–1878

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 In the Ottoman case, they were reinforced by European pressure on the Porte to grant equal rights to religious minorities as part of the modernising Tanzimat agenda. 19 It was in this context that diplomatic intervention in the Jewish question moved beyond the episodic, with formal guarantees of religious equality incorporated into the Treaty of Paris (1856) and the Treaty of Berlin (1878). Since the latter led the Romanian government to alter its constitution in the face of entrenched popular resistance, it can certainly be understood as an example of coercive diplomacy at the highest level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 In the Ottoman case, they were reinforced by European pressure on the Porte to grant equal rights to religious minorities as part of the modernising Tanzimat agenda. 19 It was in this context that diplomatic intervention in the Jewish question moved beyond the episodic, with formal guarantees of religious equality incorporated into the Treaty of Paris (1856) and the Treaty of Berlin (1878). Since the latter led the Romanian government to alter its constitution in the face of entrenched popular resistance, it can certainly be understood as an example of coercive diplomacy at the highest level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%