2017
DOI: 10.1080/23311835.2017.1338638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators and their application to group decision making problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Insert Table 7 here From the above results shown in Table 7, we can know that the ranking order of the four alternatives and optimal alternative are in agreement with the results of [32,37]. For Garg [32] (IPFWA) and Liang et al [17] (IPFWA), the optimal alternative is A 3 , which is different from other methods, it is unreasonable due to its drawback discussed in Definition 12.…”
Section: A Comparison Analysis From Example 6 Examplesupporting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Insert Table 7 here From the above results shown in Table 7, we can know that the ranking order of the four alternatives and optimal alternative are in agreement with the results of [32,37]. For Garg [32] (IPFWA) and Liang et al [17] (IPFWA), the optimal alternative is A 3 , which is different from other methods, it is unreasonable due to its drawback discussed in Definition 12.…”
Section: A Comparison Analysis From Example 6 Examplesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Insert Table 6 here If the existing methods in Garg [32], Rahman et al [37], Liang et al [17], and the proposed method are applied to solve the MCDM problem in Example 6, then the results can be obtained and are shown in Table 7.…”
Section: A Comparison Analysis From Example 6 Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations