2020
DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2019.2930932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Set and Theory of Weak Continuity Constraints for Accurate Multiclass Image Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen from Figure 5 , after the number of pixel points is increased to 200, the image similarity value of the proposed algorithm is always higher than that of other literature algorithms, and it shows significantly higher than that of other literature algorithms at each pixel point; especially, when the number of pixel points is 500 and 3000, the similarity curve of the proposed algorithm shows two small peaks with significant advantages. In contrast, the similarity values obtained with the other algorithms are lower than those of the original image, in which, the similarity of Yang et al [ 6 ] is relatively high above 0.7, the similarity of Dhar and Kundu [ 7 ] is also close to 0.7, the highest similarity of the algorithms of the Dissanayake et al [ 8 ] and Zhou et al [ 9 ] is above 0.6, and Sun et al [ 10 ] has the lowest and does not exceed 0.6. The feature quantity of these algorithms differs greatly from the original image, indicating that the images segmented by the algorithms do not retain the original information well and are less effective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As can be seen from Figure 5 , after the number of pixel points is increased to 200, the image similarity value of the proposed algorithm is always higher than that of other literature algorithms, and it shows significantly higher than that of other literature algorithms at each pixel point; especially, when the number of pixel points is 500 and 3000, the similarity curve of the proposed algorithm shows two small peaks with significant advantages. In contrast, the similarity values obtained with the other algorithms are lower than those of the original image, in which, the similarity of Yang et al [ 6 ] is relatively high above 0.7, the similarity of Dhar and Kundu [ 7 ] is also close to 0.7, the highest similarity of the algorithms of the Dissanayake et al [ 8 ] and Zhou et al [ 9 ] is above 0.6, and Sun et al [ 10 ] has the lowest and does not exceed 0.6. The feature quantity of these algorithms differs greatly from the original image, indicating that the images segmented by the algorithms do not retain the original information well and are less effective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increase of image information, the highest information loss index of the proposed algorithm is only 0.18. However, the information loss index of the algorithms of Yang et al [ 6 ], Dhar and Kundu [ 7 ], Dissanayake et al [ 8 ], and Zhou et al [ 9 ] reaches 0.30 when the amount of image information is 500; the information loss of the algorithm of Sun et al [ 10 ] is severer, and the information loss index is 0.37 at an image information level of 500. As shown in Figure 6 , the information loss index curves of the proposed algorithm are lower than other literature algorithms at each image information amount, which has a significant advantage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, a significant improvement has been made in shifting from a type-1 fuzzy logic system (T1 FLS) to interval type-2 fuzzy logic system (IT2 FLS) by the researchers in recent years. IT2 FLSs have been effectively applied in the various applications of image processing systems such as classification (Majeed et al, 2018;Rubio et al, 2017), filtering (Singh et al, 2018), segmentation (Dhar and Kundu, 2019;Zhao et al, 2019), and edge detection (Castillo et al, 2017;Gonzalez and Melin, 2017;Gonzalez et al, 2016;Martínez et al, 2019;Melin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%