2016
DOI: 10.4314/jfas.v8i2.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interval type-2 fuzzy gain-adaptive controller of a Doubly Fed Induction Machine (DFIM)

Abstract: This paper presents a comparison between an Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Gain-Adaptive IP (IT2FGAIP) controller and a conventional IP controller used for speed control with a direct stator flux orientation control of a doubly fed induction motor. In particular, the introduction part of the paper presents a Direct Stator Flux Orientation Control (DSFOC), the first part of this paper presents a description of the mathematical model of DFIM, and an adaptive IP controller is proposed for the speed control of DFIM in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DFIM mathematical model must be taken into account some simplify hypotheses to get a dynamic model make it possible to control the electrical system. [19].…”
Section: Description Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DFIM mathematical model must be taken into account some simplify hypotheses to get a dynamic model make it possible to control the electrical system. [19].…”
Section: Description Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those works by Al Mashhadany [22], Singh et al [9] made a comparison between type 2 and type 1 fuzzy logic control, and classic PID control of the brushless DC motor. Loukal and Benalia [23], and Ramya et al [24] conducted a comparision between the PID hybrid controllers with self-adjusting gains with fuzzy logic type 1 and 2, and classic PID regulators is made.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the faultless mode, it is seen that the second-order sliding mode control is sufficient and it is better than the interval fuzzy logic type 2 control. the most difference between them is the interval type 2 fuzzy logic control possesses the higher energy consumption and too slow in computation [23,34]. But in the case of the existence of a fault, we see that the interval type 2 fuzzy logic control gives us good results compared to the second-order sliding mode control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to design and implement, but it has difficulty in dealing with parameter variations, and load disturbances [10,11]. The control objective is to produce of control decoupled of the flux and the torque of the DSIM like DC motors [7], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%