2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.03.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interval statistic based reliability analysis method on small sample hot test of satellite thruster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the parameters of the Weibull distribution, fitted in terms of the interference threshold, were β = 1.32, 𝜃 = 27.6, 𝛾 = 6, and R 2 = 0.99487. Furthermore, the results obtained by applying the bootstrap method [21], which was implemented to test the goodness-of-fit of the data, showed that more than 90% of the damage threshold test data fell in the 95% confidence interval of the Weibull distri-bution in the 0-45 kV/m interval, and thus could be applied to describe the overall distribution of the data. Furthermore, according to the results depicted by the fitted Weibull curve, when the probability of failure was 95%, the corresponding peak field strength was 40.4 kV/m.…”
Section: Interference Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the parameters of the Weibull distribution, fitted in terms of the interference threshold, were β = 1.32, 𝜃 = 27.6, 𝛾 = 6, and R 2 = 0.99487. Furthermore, the results obtained by applying the bootstrap method [21], which was implemented to test the goodness-of-fit of the data, showed that more than 90% of the damage threshold test data fell in the 95% confidence interval of the Weibull distri-bution in the 0-45 kV/m interval, and thus could be applied to describe the overall distribution of the data. Furthermore, according to the results depicted by the fitted Weibull curve, when the probability of failure was 95%, the corresponding peak field strength was 40.4 kV/m.…”
Section: Interference Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, buffer tests of the LBM face the problem of limited sample size and zerofailure data. On the one hand, aerospace machinery products are expensive and produced in limited batches, allowing only small-sample reliability tests [14][15][16]. On the other hand, RDTs typically do not permit sample failures; otherwise, they would be judged as unqualified [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damage threshold distribution of the main coupling port of the system is obtained by system-level effect threshold tests and statistical distribution fitting methods. However, for practical assessment application, the number of system-under-test (SUT) samples is often limited to less than the sample number required for ordinary statistical distribution fittings [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%