2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cdc40024.2019.9029480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interval Prediction for Continuous-Time Systems with Parametric Uncertainties

Abstract: The problem of behaviour prediction for linear parameter-varying systems is considered in the interval framework. It is assumed that the system is subject to uncertain inputs and the vector of scheduling parameters is unmeasurable, but all uncertainties take values in a given admissible set. Then an interval predictor is designed and its stability is guaranteed applying Lyapunov function with a novel structure. The conditions of stability are formulated in the form of linear matrix inequalities. Efficiency of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where x t ∈ R + is a non-negative system state, whose initial conditions belong to a given interval x 0 ∈ [x 0 , x 0 ], a t ∈ R + and d t ∈ R are uncertain inputs, which also take values in known intervals a t ∈ [a t , a t ], d t ∈ [d t , d t ], for all t ∈ N. So, we assume that x 0 ≤ x 0 , 0 ≤ a t ≤ a t and d t ≤ d t are known for all t ∈ N. The imposed non-negativity constraints on x t and a t correspond to the case of the model (1). We wish to calculate the lower x t and upper x t predictions on the state x t of this system under the introduced hypotheses on all uncertain variables, which have to satisfy x t ≤ x t ≤ x t , ∀t ∈ N. The theory of interval observers and predictors [17], [22] answers this question, and a possible solution (that utilizes the non-negativity of x t and a t ) is as follows:…”
Section: Interval Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where x t ∈ R + is a non-negative system state, whose initial conditions belong to a given interval x 0 ∈ [x 0 , x 0 ], a t ∈ R + and d t ∈ R are uncertain inputs, which also take values in known intervals a t ∈ [a t , a t ], d t ∈ [d t , d t ], for all t ∈ N. So, we assume that x 0 ≤ x 0 , 0 ≤ a t ≤ a t and d t ≤ d t are known for all t ∈ N. The imposed non-negativity constraints on x t and a t correspond to the case of the model (1). We wish to calculate the lower x t and upper x t predictions on the state x t of this system under the introduced hypotheses on all uncertain variables, which have to satisfy x t ≤ x t ≤ x t , ∀t ∈ N. The theory of interval observers and predictors [17], [22] answers this question, and a possible solution (that utilizes the non-negativity of x t and a t ) is as follows:…”
Section: Interval Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 4. The boundedness of the state of (5) established in Theorem 3 does not imply the stability of the internal dynamics of the interval predictor (it is also a reason to impose the explicit saturation in ( 5)), which is a frequent and challenging problem for the predictors [16], [22]. Remark 5.…”
Section: Interval Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…circadian oscillations in [26] or chemostat [27]. An application of the proposed approach for analysis of stability of an interval predictor is given in [28].…”
Section: Analysis Of a Modified Generalized Lotka-volterra Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of IOs has been exhaustively studied, and the literature reports results on linear [8], linear parameter-varying [9], nonlinear [10], discrete-time [11], as well as on time-delay systems [12]. Recently an interval predictor (IP), sometimes also called framer, was presented in [13], [14] for systems in continuous time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%