2017
DOI: 10.3354/meps12349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intertidal invertebrate harvesting: a meta-analysis of impacts and recovery in an important waterbird prey resource

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This differentiation in predictability may also require different management strategies to enable recovery in disturbed ecosystems. Several additional analyses have quantified the responses to a certain type of disturbance (Cameron et al ; Clarke et al ) or for a certain ecosystem (Winfree et al ; Holden & Treseder ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This differentiation in predictability may also require different management strategies to enable recovery in disturbed ecosystems. Several additional analyses have quantified the responses to a certain type of disturbance (Cameron et al ; Clarke et al ) or for a certain ecosystem (Winfree et al ; Holden & Treseder ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recovery of benthic invertebrate assemblages from dredging disturbances varies according to local environmental conditions, gear type, and substrate (Ferns et al, ; Hall & Harding, ) and the feeding quality of cleared areas is likely to change over time. Following mechanical dredging on intertidal mudflats, a significant recovery of non‐target species abundance is highly variable and could be up to 500 days, and a significant recovery of species biomass could exceed this time period (Clarke et al, ). After 6 months, the higher benthic macroinvertebrate biomass measured in the cleared area in comparison with the undisturbed mudflats could suggest that the removal of the oysters did not significantly disturb the benthos that had become established beneath.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been attempts to remove wild Pacific oysters from rocky habitats where density has been low (Guy & Roberts, 2010;Herbert et al, 2016;McKnight & Chudleigh, 2015), mechanical dredging of oysters would appear to be the only practical solution to reef removal on soft-sediment habitats. However, mobile gears can cause significant disturbance to intertidal benthic habitats and both target and non-target species (Clarke, Hughes, Herbert, Esteves, & Stillman, 2017;Ferns, Rostron, & Sima, 2000;Piersma et al, 2001;Spencer, Kaiser, & Edwards, 1998). In the Wadden Sea, where wild settlement is extensive, total eradication of Pacific oysters through dredging has not occurred owing to concerns that it would harm the ecosystem (Reise, Wegener, Sea, & List, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameter yang dibandingkan adalah nilai rata-rata panjang karapas dan standar deviasi dari masingmasing penelitian (Curtin et al 2002). Perbandingan dilakukan dengan menggunakan nilai standard mean difference (Dick et al 2017;Clarke et al 2017) yang diolah menggunakan perangkat lunak Review Manger 5.3 (academic version). Varian antar penelitian (Vwithin) diperoleh dengan membandingkan jumlah standar deviasi penelitian tahun ke-i (S1) dengan standar deviasi penelitian tahun eksisting (S2) terhadap jumlah sampel tahun ke-i (n1) dan jumlah sampel tahun eksisting (n2).…”
Section: Metodeunclassified
“…Nilai standard mean differrence (d) diperoleh dengan membandingkan selisih rata-rata lebar karapas hasil penelitian tahun ke-i (X1) dan lebar karapas hasil penelitian tahun eksisting (X2) terhadap nilai variana antar penelitian (Vwithin). Formula perhitungannya adalah sebagai berikut (Clarke et al 2017).…”
Section: Metodeunclassified