2010
DOI: 10.1075/ps.1.2.04fur
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intertextuality, mediation, and members’ categories in focus groups on humor

Abstract: This paper extends studies on intertextuality into a more explicitly interactional context. I examine the actual process of intertextuality where comedy audiences construct recombinant selves through making sense of various membership categories as well as through making sense of a certain kind of comedy. The examination of this process requires receptive research; however, most studies leave the interpretive process unanalyzed. Conducting both a sequential analysis and a membership categorization analysis wil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research has become increasingly interested in using visual materials as research data. Among others, Francis and Hart (1997), Furukawa (2012), Raudaskoski (2011), Roca-Cuberes andVentura (2016), and Stokoe (2012) have utilized TV programs, news, and commercials in research on membership categorization. Videos have been used, for instance, by Burdelski and Fukuka (2019), Edwards and Fitzgerald (2015), Evans and Fitzgerald (2017), Licoppe (2015), Reynolds (2017), Rintel (2015), Smith (2017), and Watson (2005).…”
Section: Membership Categorization Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has become increasingly interested in using visual materials as research data. Among others, Francis and Hart (1997), Furukawa (2012), Raudaskoski (2011), Roca-Cuberes andVentura (2016), and Stokoe (2012) have utilized TV programs, news, and commercials in research on membership categorization. Videos have been used, for instance, by Burdelski and Fukuka (2019), Edwards and Fitzgerald (2015), Evans and Fitzgerald (2017), Licoppe (2015), Reynolds (2017), Rintel (2015), Smith (2017), and Watson (2005).…”
Section: Membership Categorization Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%