2002
DOI: 10.4102/ve.v23i2.1211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intertextuality and Biblical Studies: A Review

Abstract: Intertextuality and Biblical Studies: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intertekstualitas diperkenalkan dalam studi Alkitab sejak tahun 1989. Mula-mula intertekstualitas hanyalah untuk mengaji kaitan antara Perjanjian Lama dan Perjanjian Baru [10]. Pendekatan intertekstualitas pertama kali diperkenalkan oleh Julia Kristeva.…”
Section: Metodeunclassified
“…Intertekstualitas diperkenalkan dalam studi Alkitab sejak tahun 1989. Mula-mula intertekstualitas hanyalah untuk mengaji kaitan antara Perjanjian Lama dan Perjanjian Baru [10]. Pendekatan intertekstualitas pertama kali diperkenalkan oleh Julia Kristeva.…”
Section: Metodeunclassified
“…Numerous scholars argue that Hays and his followers do not actually embody the true spirit of intertextuality. Put differently, Hays employs the concept from poststructuralism but applies it in a structuralist way, that is, a literary-critical approach (Moyise 2002: 15; Paul 2000: 258). In addition to this lack of terminological clarity, Hays has also been criticized for his lack of precise definitions in his own proposal.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Biblical Studies’ Intertextualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 35. Reciprocation is not necessarily relevant for all allusions, but it can benefit a reader if it does occur (Sommer, 1998: 18; cf. Schultz, 1999: 207; Moyise, 2002: 424). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%