2010
DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.3.1080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intertemporal Consumption and Credit Constraints: Does Total Expenditure Respond to an Exogenous Shock to Credit?

Abstract: There is continuing controversy over the importance of credit constraints. This paper investigates whether total household expenditure and debt is affected by an exogenous increase in access to credit provided by a credit market reform that enabled Danish house owners to use housing equity as collateral for consumption loans. We find that the magnitude of the response is correlated with the amount of equity released by the reform and that the effect is strongest for younger households. Even for this group, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
72
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the incidence and impact of such constraints is an empirical question of long-standing and continued importance (Hall & Mishkin, 1982;Zeldes, 1989;Jappelli, 1990;Jappelli, Piske, & Souleles, 1998;Gross & Souleles, 2002;Leth-Petersen, 2010). A key challenge in this literature is that researchers rarely have direct observations on whether credit constraints are binding, and thus must typically infer the incidence of credit constraints from observed behavior, such as individuals' holding no liquid assets or the responsiveness of consumption to transitory shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, the incidence and impact of such constraints is an empirical question of long-standing and continued importance (Hall & Mishkin, 1982;Zeldes, 1989;Jappelli, 1990;Jappelli, Piske, & Souleles, 1998;Gross & Souleles, 2002;Leth-Petersen, 2010). A key challenge in this literature is that researchers rarely have direct observations on whether credit constraints are binding, and thus must typically infer the incidence of credit constraints from observed behavior, such as individuals' holding no liquid assets or the responsiveness of consumption to transitory shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gross and Souleles (2002) acknowledge that their evidence can partially be explained by a precautionary motive caused by a potential constraint. Leth-Petersen (2010) identifies consumption growth in Denmark as being due to a change in credit conditions, but without taking a stand on whether this is a direct effect or a precautionary effect. Our paper addresses this issue directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore follow Leth-Petersen (2010) andSheiner (1995) and normalise all monetary variables by a proxy for permanent income in order to obtain a relative measure. We use the fact that we have a very long panel containing income information to construct a proxy for permanent income given by 10 years of disposable income (prior to the house price fall) from 1998 to 2007.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow (among others) Engelhardt (1996) and Leth-Petersen (2010) and exclude households that bought or sold any part of a property within the period of interest. This is because households that plan to move in the near future are likely to change their saving behaviour as moving is associated with moving costs, which we observe as dis-saving thereby leading to a different saving pattern for this selected group of households.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more direct approach we adopt the low liquid asset measure, which was suggested by Zeldes (1989) and succesfully applied by Leth-Petersen (2006), to control for borrowing constraints. They argue that the ratio of liquid assets to income is a powerful way to identify the households who potentially face a binding credit constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%