Intersubjectivity: Towards a Dialogical Analysis

Gillespie, Alex; Cornish, Flora

doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00419.x

Cited by 279 publications

(182 citation statements)

References 72 publications

(82 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

159

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As his ideas have moved into social science, and informed empirical research, there has been increasing demand to clarify the way in which his ideas inform research for both transparency and training purposes. There have been several attempts to formalize a method, such as coding frames for analyzing dominance (Linell, Gustavsson & Juvonen 1988), direct and indirect quotations (Gillespie & Cornish, 2010a) and mapping out positions, especially within the dialogical self tradition (Hermans, 2001b;Raggatt, 2002;Cunha, Salgado & Goncalves, 2011). Are such attempts at formalization consistent with the basic assumptions of dialogism?…”

Section: Dialogism and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sensitizing Questions: A Method to Facilitate Analyzing the Meaning of an Utterance

Gillespie

Cornish

2014

Integr. psych. behav.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Dialogism and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We build upon our previous work on intersubjectivity (Gillespie & Cornish, 2010a), to propose a method for analyzing the situated and intersubjective nature of meaning. Our approach conceptualizes meaning as 'dialogical' because the meaning of an utterance is inextricably part of situated dialogue (Linell, 2009).…”

Section: Dialogism and Meaningmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sensitizing Questions: A Method to Facilitate Analyzing the Meaning of an Utterance

Gillespie

Cornish

2014

Integr. psych. behav.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Then, as we have been arguing (see unnoticed: "Relying almost solely on self-reflexivity and self-report to determine selfpositions undermines the possibility of analysing some experiences that are somehow not completely accessible or understandable to the person and, therefore, not captured through one's self-reflections" (Cunha et al, 2011, p. 66). Gillespie and Cornish (2010) also eloquently argued that if I-positions are not transparent to the speakers, then self-reports are inadequate methods to capture the implicit and experiential nature of the positioning process.…”

Section: Examining Methods Within the Dialogical Self Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Positioning Microanalysis: Studying the Self Through the Exploration of Dialogical Processes

Salgado

Cunha

Bento

2013

Integr. psych. behav.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Self-multiplicity is a widely recognized phenomenon within psychology. The study of how self-continuity emerges amidst self-multiplicity remains a crucial issue, however. Dialogical approaches are widely viewed as suitable for developing this field of study but they demand coherent methods compatible with their theoretical bases. After reviewing the available methods for the study of the dialogical self, as well as other dialogical methods for the study of psychotherapy, we conclude that we still lack a method which can be used by external observers and is devoted to the systematic tracing of the dialogical dynamics of self-positions as they unfold over time. A new method, positioning microanalysis, is described in detail as a possible way to overcome current limitations in methods focused on the dialogicality inherent in selfhood processes. Positioning microanalysis takes a genetic-developmental perspective on dialogical processes in the self and allows for the depiction of microgenetic movements of self-positions over time and the establishment of more or less stable sequences or patterns of positions. This is illustrated by its application to an emotion-focused therapy session.

show abstract

“…A common MO may not necessarily lead to the same mental signs for two different people. This is essentially the question of intersubjectivity [36]. Physical things inherently allows for several users to have simultaneous focus and control.…”

Section: Designing Ddes For a Learning Experiencementioning

confidence: 99%

Information Holodeck: Thinking in Technology Ecologies

Chu

Quek

2013

Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Information can be persistently represented on a multitude of devices beyond a single screen and session. This paper explores how technological display and device ecosystems (DDEs) may support human thinking, learning and sensemaking. We propose a theoretical foundation that extends Vygotsky's sign mediation triangle to include digital information. Through a process we call objectification, perceivable objects, e.g. interface objects, tangible technologies, can be associated with signs to support thinking. We present a qualitative study of learning in a testbed DDE with 12 graduate students. We developed a method that traces digital objects within 'thinking episodes' to help us evaluate how technology configurations support objectification. Our findings relate two storylines of how DDE technologies may afford objectification. Our work advances a method informed by psychological theory to examine device ecologies for their potential for learning, and articulates affordances for the design of technology that can help to support higher thought.

show abstract

Intersubjectivity: Towards a Dialogical Analysis

Abstract: Acknowledgement: Alex Gillespie would like to acknowledge the support of an

Cited by 279 publications

References 72 publications

Sensitizing Questions: A Method to Facilitate Analyzing the Meaning of an Utterance

Sensitizing Questions: A Method to Facilitate Analyzing the Meaning of an Utterance

Positioning Microanalysis: Studying the Self Through the Exploration of Dialogical Processes

Information Holodeck: Thinking in Technology Ecologies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About