2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersubjectivity and other grounds for action-coordination in an environment of restricted interaction: Coordinating with oncoming traffic when passing an obstacle

Abstract: externalization' and 'body glosses' (Goffman, 1971, 11-12). In a study on crossing a crowded intersection, Liberman (2013, ch.q I thank Elwys De Stefani, Henrike Helmer and an anonymous reviewer for valuable comments on a prior version of this paper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As we will argue, paired actions are spatially tied to, and generated via, traffic infrastructures and vehicle trajectories, acceleration, deceleration, positioning within queues, convoys, lanes, boxes etc. An example of a common and expected adjacency pairing of moves, drawing upon the spatial arrangement of vehicles, is an offer in the form of a gap in a queue produced ahead of a vehicle and an acceptance by the other vehicle by moving into the gap (Deppermann 2019;Haddington & Rauniomaa, 2014;Laurier, 2019). In another common action sequence, the adjacency pairing produced by a vehicle behind overtaking a vehicle (or vehicles) ahead leaves open how the other party responds to the action.…”
Section: Mobile Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we will argue, paired actions are spatially tied to, and generated via, traffic infrastructures and vehicle trajectories, acceleration, deceleration, positioning within queues, convoys, lanes, boxes etc. An example of a common and expected adjacency pairing of moves, drawing upon the spatial arrangement of vehicles, is an offer in the form of a gap in a queue produced ahead of a vehicle and an acceptance by the other vehicle by moving into the gap (Deppermann 2019;Haddington & Rauniomaa, 2014;Laurier, 2019). In another common action sequence, the adjacency pairing produced by a vehicle behind overtaking a vehicle (or vehicles) ahead leaves open how the other party responds to the action.…”
Section: Mobile Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apprendre à conduire une voiture suppose des compétences diverses et complémentaires : si le fonctionnement de la voiture et le code de la route peuvent être appris de façon théorique, leur application à la situation de trafic concrète constitue l'un des objectifs principaux des leçons de conduite. Les conducteurs doivent se coordonner avec les autres usagers de la route (Liberman 2013 ;Deppermann 2019 ;Deppermann et al 2018) de manière à assurer le flux régulier du trafic. Cette interaction 'inter-unités' (De Stefani & Gazin 2019) constitue un cours d'action continu qui se déroule en simultané avec l'interaction 'intra-unité' se déployant à l'intérieur de l'habitacle.…”
Section: La Complexité Interactionnelle De La Circulation Routièreunclassified
“…This approach has grown in importance in studies of mobility. Recent research has focused on driving lessons and driver training (Broth et al, 2018;de Stefani et al, 2018;Deppermann, 2018;Merlino and Mondada, 2019;Mondada, 2018). Earlier studies revealed how drivers and passengers co-ordinate and manage their driving with each other and in relation to other vehicles (Brown and Laurier, 2012;Haddington, 2012;Laurier et al, 2008;Mondada, 2012) and described specialised forms of driving (Watson, 1999).…”
Section: Aim Of the Paper And Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%