2022
DOI: 10.1148/rg.220073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interstitial Lung Abnormalities at CT: Subtypes, Clinical Significance, and Associations with Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most clinically significant result about ILA is that patients with ILA have higher mortality than patients without ILA. Various research results in healthy subjects have been published on these results, and there is a very close consistency between studies [ 2 , 7 , 14 , 18 , 19 , 27 ], for example, in general population studies (the Framingham Heart Study [FHS] and the AGES-Reykjavik study) or among populations of smokers assessed for COPD or lung cancer screening (Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial) [ 2 , 8 , 14 , 16 - 19 , 23 ]. The hazard ratios (HRs) of increased mortality range in subjects with ILA on low-dose chest CT from 1.3 to 2.7 compared with them without ILA.…”
Section: Body Partsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most clinically significant result about ILA is that patients with ILA have higher mortality than patients without ILA. Various research results in healthy subjects have been published on these results, and there is a very close consistency between studies [ 2 , 7 , 14 , 18 , 19 , 27 ], for example, in general population studies (the Framingham Heart Study [FHS] and the AGES-Reykjavik study) or among populations of smokers assessed for COPD or lung cancer screening (Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial) [ 2 , 8 , 14 , 16 - 19 , 23 ]. The hazard ratios (HRs) of increased mortality range in subjects with ILA on low-dose chest CT from 1.3 to 2.7 compared with them without ILA.…”
Section: Body Partsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…As already mentioned, ILAs are non-dependent abnormalities affecting more than 5% of any lung zone. Although it is retained to exclude minimal opacities and to conform to previous published literature, the threshold extent of 5% is acknowledged to be arbitrary and subjective [ 1 , 2 , 4 , 8 , 15 ]. For this reason, it is confusing for readers to determine whether the ILA is about 5% when it is found on chest CT.…”
Section: Body Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adjudication of ILAs was reviewed by expert thoracic radiologists and an interstitial lung disease specialist (IM) reviewed chest HRCT and characterized the features of ILAs if present. Consistent with Fleischner Society definitions, we defined ILAs as the incidental finding of non‐dependent abnormalities that affected more than 5% of the cross‐sectional area of at least one of three lung zones on CT images 14,15 . ILAs were characterized as fibrotic when CT findings of architectural distortion, reticulation, traction bronchiectasis, and/or honeycombing are present (Figure 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] The ILDs are related to the increased risk of lung cancer and complications related to lung cancer treatment, which can be predicted by CT-based radiomics signatures. [13][14][15] Therefore, it is vital to distinguish "healthy aging" from diseases. The establishment of the "normal" lung appearance especially ILAs in the nonsmoking asymptomatic elderly cohort may avoid misdiagnosis and over-treatment of pulmonary diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%