2009
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interstitial deletion 2p11.2–p12: Further delineation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(7 reference statements)
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, our patient does not manifest the main features of SPG31, some of which are present in previously reported patients with deletion of 2p11.2-p12 (Tzschach et al, 2009;Writzl et al, 2009). Furthermore, she does not present feet deformities that would seem to be a characteristic in patients with REEP1 mutation (De Bot et al, 2010;Du et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, our patient does not manifest the main features of SPG31, some of which are present in previously reported patients with deletion of 2p11.2-p12 (Tzschach et al, 2009;Writzl et al, 2009). Furthermore, she does not present feet deformities that would seem to be a characteristic in patients with REEP1 mutation (De Bot et al, 2010;Du et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…The proband is only the fourth case so far reported for which breakpoints of the 2p11.2-p12 deletion have been characterized by molecular methods (Barber et al, 2005;Tzschach et al, 2009;Writzl et al, 2009). This finding makes comparisons between the present phenotype and the previous reported ones difficult to carry out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIM 613564). [9][10][11][12] All show mild-to-moderate intellectual disability, a very happy disposition, speech delay, delayed motor development and minor facial anomalies such as high forehead, broad nasal bridge and large low set ears (Table 1). Despite the very large size of the del(2)(p11.2p12), the clinical phenotype is relatively mild when compared generally with similar-sized deletions reported in literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 HSP-related features were seen in patient 1, the previous patient with the 9.4-Mbp deletion 2 and other patients with REEP1 deletions. 10,11 The age distribution for SPG31 shows a bimodal pattern of o20 and 430 years of age 13,14 leaving a possibility that HSP is not yet manifest in patient 1. Figure 1 Interstitial deletion 2p11.2-2p12 in patients 1 and 2 as identified by high-resolution Cytoscan HD array.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…REEP1 variants are a well‐recognized and comparatively frequent cause of autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) (Zuchner et al., ), an axonopathy that primarily affects upper motor neurons (Fink, ). The vast majority of corresponding mutations are truncating and include whole gene deletions (Beetz et al., ; Writzl, Lovrecic, & Peterlin, ; Zuchner et al., ). A 50% loss of REEP1 function, that is, haploinsufficiency, is thus generally assumed to be the pathomechanism that underlies REEP1 ‐associated HSP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%