Interstate disparities in the performances in combatting COVID-19 in India: efficiency estimates across states

Abstract

Background Currently, the novel coronavirus or COVID-19 pandemic poses the greatest global health threat worldwide, and India is no exception. As an overpopulated developing country, it is very difficult to maintain social distancing to restrict the spread of the disease in India. Under these circumstances, it is necessary to examine India’s interstate performances to combat COVID-19. This study aims to explore twin objectives: to investigate the comparative efficiency of Indian states to combat COVID-19 and to unfold the factors responsible for interstate disparities in the efficiency in combatting COVID-19. Methods The stochastic production frontier model was utilized for data analysis. The empirical analysis was facilitated by the inefficiency effects model, revealing the factors that influence interstate variability in disease management efficiency. Three types of variables, namely, output, inputs, and exogenous, were used to measure health system efficiency. The relevant variables were compiled from secondary sources. The recovery rate from COVID-19 was the output variable and health infrastructures were considered as the input variable. On the contrary, the non-health determinants considered to have a strong influence on the efficiency of states’ disease management, but could not be considered as input variables, were recognised as exogenous variables. These exogenous variables were specifically used for the inefficiency analysis. Results The empirical results demonstrated the existence of disparities across Indian states in the level of efficiency in combatting COVID-19. A non-trivial outcome of this study was that Tamil Nadu was the best performer and Manipur was the worst performer of the investigated states. Variables such as elderly people, sex ratio, literacy rate, population density, influenced the efficiency of states, and thus, affected the recovery rate. Conclusion This study argues for the efficient utilisation of the existing health infrastructures in India. Simultaneously, the study suggests improving the health infrastructure to achieve a long-run benefit.

Women's political leadership and efficiency in reducing COVID-19 death rate: An application of technical inefficiency effects model across Indian states

“…This contemplates a serious condition and obviously in these circumstances as expected the COVID-19 death rate will increase. A similar result is also documented in Maity, Ghosh, and Barlaskar, [ 22 ]. It is noteworthy that the effect of some of the listed health infrastructure variables, viz., ICU beds, Ventilators, and Labs become insignificant.…”

“…On the contrary, if the state was as inefficient as the most inefficient state, Manipur, the ability of the state to reduce the death rate of COVID-19 could have declined to 4% with the corresponding death rate of 1.28%. These divergences in the health outcomes across Indian states may be due to the differences in the utilization as well as performances of the existing health system of the states [ 22 ].…”

“…Thus the corresponding estimated coefficient becomes positive and significant contemplating the positive role of the police force in combatting COVID-19. The positive and significant roles of the said inputs are re-establishing the patent facts [ 22 ]. The negative and significant estimated coefficient of the Isolation bed discloses that an increase in the Isolation bed increases the COVID-19 death rate.…”

COVID-19 testing, timeliness and positivity from ICMR’s laboratory surveillance network in India: Profile of 176 million individuals tested and 188 million tests, March 2020 to January 2021

“…Telangana was the only southern state that reported an incidence of <1 per 100 individuals. Inter-state differences in responding to COVID-19 have been previously explored [34,35]. Apart from the actual differences in how the pandemic evolved in different geographical regions, other factors that could have contributed to the apparent differences in disease burden include access to testing (especially in the early phases when resources were limited), the extent to which the ICMR testing strategy guidelines were followed and how robustly was the contact tracing carried out.…”

Relevance of developing public health service cadres alongside a more prevention oriented Indian health system: an overview

“…Some states were severely impacted and went through testing later, while others were not adequately controlled or tested. 7 So, with doctors with clinical excellence, we need a workforce well versed in different aspects of disease epidemiology, health management, health finance and health economic analysis and moreover someone with leadership or managerial capabilities to look over and act as a bridge between the different sectors of health. 8,9 In a symposium on providing affordable and accessible healthcare, eminent public health expert Dr. T. Sundararaman said that a public health cadre's job responsibilities include largely organising public interventions, addressing social and environmental determinants of health, and taking managerial roles in the delivery of healthcare services, particularly primary healthcare.…”