1983
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7322(83)90036-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interspecific variation and sexual dimorphism of antennal receptor morphology, in European Yponomeuta (Latreille) (Lepidoptera : Yponomeutidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The s. chaetica type I closely resemble the similarly named in Yponomeuta (VAN DER PERS et al 1980;CUPERUS et al 1983;CUPERUS 1983) in having a distinct socket and a terminal pore. Such sensilla where shown to be sensitive to mechanical stimulation (VAN DER PERS and DEN OTTER 1978) and assumed to have contact-chemoreceptive function in addition (VAN DER PERS et al 1980).…”
Section: Morphological and Functional Considerationssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The s. chaetica type I closely resemble the similarly named in Yponomeuta (VAN DER PERS et al 1980;CUPERUS et al 1983;CUPERUS 1983) in having a distinct socket and a terminal pore. Such sensilla where shown to be sensitive to mechanical stimulation (VAN DER PERS and DEN OTTER 1978) and assumed to have contact-chemoreceptive function in addition (VAN DER PERS et al 1980).…”
Section: Morphological and Functional Considerationssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Studies on insect sensilla predominantly concentrate on functional morphology and physiology, and recently resulted in an accumulation of knowledge on ultrastructure and function (reviews: ALTNER 1977; ALTNER and PRILLINGER 1980;SLIFER 1970;ZACHARUK 1980). Studies on comparative morphology on antenna1 sensilla and the importance of these structures in phylogenetic reasoning are few and comprise studies on Coleoptera-Lamellicornia (MEINECKE 1975) and Hymenoptera-Aculeata (WALTHER 1979 DS FAUCHEUX 1979FAUCHEUX 1982a, b, 1984CUPERUS 1983, C. et al 1983FAUCHEUX 1978bWALL 1978ALBERT and SEABROOK 1972DEN O~E R et al 1978SUBCHEV 1977aSELLIER 1977CORNFORD et al 1973CALLAHAN 1973SELLIER 1974MYERS 1968SUBCHEV 1977bSCHNEIDER STEINBRECHT 1973FAUCHEUX 1978aBOECKH et al 1960FAUCHEUX 1978aKEIL 1984FAUCHEUX 1978aJEFFERSON et al 1970FLOWER and HELSON 1974 For sound conclusions with regard to the evolution of these organs, it is of paramount importance to know the antennal morphology of the groups right at the basis of the cladogram of the Lepidoptera. Fortunately, many data on antennal sensilla of primitive Lepidoptera are found in the detailed taxonomic and morphological treatments by NIELSEN, KRISTENSEN and DAVIS o n various families of non-Ditrysia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antenna of the male RBLR bears all the usual morphological types of sensilla commonly found in moths (Albert & Seabrook, 1973;Cuperus, 1983Cuperus, , 1985Cuperus et al, 1983; George & Nagy, 1984; Wall, 1978). The shorter sensilla appear to be much less abundant than the long, recurved trichoids (Fig.…”
Section: Shorter Sensillamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…PERCEPTION The distribution of sense organs on male antennae has been the subject of various studies (21,147). All Yponomeuta species examined possess the same types of sensilla, and the number and distribution of these do not differ significantly among the species with the exception of the sensilla trichodea.…”
Section: Sex Pheromonesmentioning
confidence: 99%