1995
DOI: 10.2307/2445699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interspecific Pollen Competition as a Reproductive Barrier Between Sympatric Species of Helianthus (Asteraceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
3
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
76
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Heterospecific pollen tubes grew more slowly than conspecific pollen tubes in all of the pairs of crosses, with one species pair failing to produce 50% hybrids after 100 min, the maximum pollination interval used in the study. In contrast with the results for Iris described here and those of Smith (1968Smith ( , 1970, Rieseberg et al (1995) did not find an increase (from 0%) in hybrid seed formation when Helianthus annuus pollen was given a 15 or 30 min temporal advantage over H. petiolaris pollen on H. petiolaris flowers. However, pollinations with only heterospecific pollen led to achene set that was not significantly different from that following conspecific pollinations (Rieseberg et al 1995), and therefore, longer pollination intervals than those used in their experiment may be needed to provide H. annuus pollen tubes with a growth advantage over H. petiolaris tubes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heterospecific pollen tubes grew more slowly than conspecific pollen tubes in all of the pairs of crosses, with one species pair failing to produce 50% hybrids after 100 min, the maximum pollination interval used in the study. In contrast with the results for Iris described here and those of Smith (1968Smith ( , 1970, Rieseberg et al (1995) did not find an increase (from 0%) in hybrid seed formation when Helianthus annuus pollen was given a 15 or 30 min temporal advantage over H. petiolaris pollen on H. petiolaris flowers. However, pollinations with only heterospecific pollen led to achene set that was not significantly different from that following conspecific pollinations (Rieseberg et al 1995), and therefore, longer pollination intervals than those used in their experiment may be needed to provide H. annuus pollen tubes with a growth advantage over H. petiolaris tubes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, of the three studies that used pollination intervals to assess pollentube growth as a barrier to hybridization, interspecific pollen competition has been shown to be important among two groups and is equivocal in the third (Smith 1968(Smith , 1970Rieseberg et al 1995;this study). In fact, Darwin suggested such an isolating mechanism:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We were, however, surprised at the complete hybrid compatibility at the gametic level-especially in a situation of sperm competition with another species. Unlike our results, previous studies have shown a conspecific sire advantage (Bella et al, 1992;Rieseberg et al, 1995;Geyer and Palumbi, 2005). Previous work on amphibian cross-fertilization has also shown wide among-species compatibility at the fertilization level.…”
Section: Trial Number Proportion Offspring Siredcontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…show similar results with poorer motility of heterospecific sperm stored in the spermathecae of females, resulting in lower fertilization success compared with conspecific males (Gregory and Howard, 1994). Work by and shows very similar conspecific dominance in siring success in Tribolium beetles, as do marine organisms (for example, sea urchins Geyer and Palumbi, 2005) and some plants (for example, Rieseberg et al, 1995), although the underlying mechanisms differ (reviewed in Arnold, 1997Arnold, , 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It is well established that natural populations of many species exhibit variation in the rate of pollen tube growth (Walsh & Charlesworth, 1992), but few studies have examined the extent to which differential pollen tube growth rates contribute to reproductive isolation between naturally sympatric species (Rieseberg et al, 1995 ;Carney et al, 1996). The major advantage of fast pollen tube growth rates is assumed to be gametophytic competition in mixed pollen loads (Haldane, 1932 ;Stephenson & Bertin, 1983).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%