1994
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820280608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interspecies differences in systemic drug availability following subscutaneous pulsatile administration in cattle, sheep, dogs, and rats

Abstract: Rats, dogs, sheep, and cattle were implanted subcutaneously with stainless-steel tissue cages. Bolus injections of cefoxitin and ivermectin were administered to the interiors of the tissue cages 11, 32, and 60 days after implantation to simulate pulsatile drug release from an implanted device. Plasma drug levels were determined for 6 h for cefoxitin and up to 8 days for ivermectin. Tissue cages were retrieved 3 and 6 months after implantation for macroscopic and microscopic examination. In dogs and rats, plasm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,7 However, in the case of active devices, where quick pulsatile or more complex release profiles are desired, the isolation of the implant causes a time lag due to the finite amount of time required for diffusion of the drug through the capsule. 8,9 This time delay is also a key factor in the performance of in vivo sensors. 10,11 Even if sensor components are made resistant to the immune response, the sensor must be continually recalibrated to account for the changing conditions in the tissue surrounding it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 However, in the case of active devices, where quick pulsatile or more complex release profiles are desired, the isolation of the implant causes a time lag due to the finite amount of time required for diffusion of the drug through the capsule. 8,9 This time delay is also a key factor in the performance of in vivo sensors. 10,11 Even if sensor components are made resistant to the immune response, the sensor must be continually recalibrated to account for the changing conditions in the tissue surrounding it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%