2005
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.40.7.1982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersimple Sequence Repeat Fingerprinting and Genetic Variation in a Collection of Clematis Cultivars and Commercial Germplasm

Abstract: The genus Clematis contains many well-known large flowered cultivars, as well as lesser-known nonvining species. Intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) primers were used to fingerprint 32 vining cultivars and five nonvining species (C. fruiticosa, C. integrifolia, C. heracleifolia, C. hexapetala, and C. recta) for use in assessing genetic relationships and cultivar identification. Four ISSR primers yielded a total of 44 bands … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ISSR markers have been used successfully to reveal information about lowbush blueberries. The results clearly demonstrate that ISSR markers can be used in a genetic diversity study as well as in genotypic identification of lowbush blueberries, as noted for other plant species by Prevost and Wilkinson (1999), Gardner and Hokanson (2005), Debnath (2007a), , Yakimowski and Eckert (2008) and Yao et al (2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ISSR markers have been used successfully to reveal information about lowbush blueberries. The results clearly demonstrate that ISSR markers can be used in a genetic diversity study as well as in genotypic identification of lowbush blueberries, as noted for other plant species by Prevost and Wilkinson (1999), Gardner and Hokanson (2005), Debnath (2007a), , Yakimowski and Eckert (2008) and Yao et al (2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Each marker system has its own strengths and limitations, making the choice of marker an important decision. Inter simple sequence repeat markers (ISSRs) (Zietkiewicz et al 1994) have been used successfully on a number of horticultural species including potato (Prevost and Wilkinson 1999), Clematis species (Gardner and Hokanson 2005), lingonberry Vaccinium vitis‐idaea L. (Debnath 2007a), deerberry V. stamineum L. (Yakimowski and Eckert 2008) and strawberry Fragaria cultivars (Arnau et al 2002, Korbin et al 2002, Debnath et al 2008). The ISSR primers target microsatellites that are abundant throughout the plant genome (Wang et al 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerbah et al (2001 and, more recently, Mortreau et al (2010) revealed significant differences in the chromosome organization between these two sub-species, that includes the ploidy level and the quantity of DNA, as well as heterochromatin organization and ribosomic sequences. ISSR markers have been successfully used for varietal identification, estimation of genetic relationships and genetic diversity in many ornamental species such as clematis (Gardner and Hokanson 2005), tree peony (Suo et al 2005), leucadendron (Pharmawati et al 2005), chrysanthemum (Chatterjee et al 2006) and rose (Crespel et al 2009). In our study, the polymorphism revealed by ISSR markers between the two sub-species is high (96.9%) and is in agreement with the high level of intraspecific variation already revealed in H. aspera at the molecular level by Mortreau et al (2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar ISSR polymorphism levels have already been reported in other genera, but at the interspecific level. For example, the proportion of polymorphic markers is 94.0% between five species of the genus Clematis, 99.5% between 12 species of the genus Grevillea and 98.1% between nine species of the genus Jatropha (Gardner and Hokanson 2005;Pharmawati et al 2004;Senthil Kumar et al 2009). The fact that Jaccard dissimilarity index is so high between the two subspecies of H. aspera (0.97) clearly reveals their considerable genetic differentiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISSRs cost less and are easier to use than amplified fragmentlength polymorphisms (AFLPs) and do not require prior knowledge of flanking sequences, like SSRs (Reddy et al, 2002). ISSR markers are thought to be particularly useful for study of closely related individuals that exhibit low levels of polymorphism (Zietkiewicz et al, 1994) and have been applied as a very useful alternative to fingerprinting and genetic analysis in fruit crops including strawberry (Debnath et al, 2008), raspberry (Debnath, 2007a), clematis (Gardner and Hokanson, 2005), and plum (Liu et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%