2012
DOI: 10.1017/s1355770x12000253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersectoral labor mobility and deforestation in Ghana

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This paper quantifies the effects of the determinants of intersectoral labor mobility and the effect of intersectoral labor mobility on deforestation in Ghana over the period . A cointegration and error correction modeling approach is employed. The empirical results show that labor mobility from the agricultural to the non-agricultural sector exerts negative effects on deforestation in Ghana in the long run and short run. Relative agricultural income exerts a significant negative effect on intersecto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maize is one of the most important agricultural crops, ranking 11th in global food production (Wang et al , 2015). Maize yield increases have been accomplished in part by increasing the use of agrochemicals, such as chemical fertilisers, pesticides and supplemental fieldwork operations (Owusu et al , 2012; Foley et al , 2011; Huysveld et al , 2015) . However, contemporary agricultural methods have the potential for a wide range of negative environmental consequences (Brentrup et al , 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maize is one of the most important agricultural crops, ranking 11th in global food production (Wang et al , 2015). Maize yield increases have been accomplished in part by increasing the use of agrochemicals, such as chemical fertilisers, pesticides and supplemental fieldwork operations (Owusu et al , 2012; Foley et al , 2011; Huysveld et al , 2015) . However, contemporary agricultural methods have the potential for a wide range of negative environmental consequences (Brentrup et al , 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%