2019
DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2019.1645892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersectionality, diversity, community and inclusion: untangling the knots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is in dialogue with the growing literature on intersectionality in special education and inclusive education (e.g., García & Ortiz, 2013; Thomas & Macnab, 2019), as well as research about collaborative teacher education for inclusive practices (e.g., Blanton et al, 2014; Pugach & Blanton, 2009; Villegas et al, 2017). We begin with a description of our positionalities as researchers and roles as collaborative teacher educators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This study is in dialogue with the growing literature on intersectionality in special education and inclusive education (e.g., García & Ortiz, 2013; Thomas & Macnab, 2019), as well as research about collaborative teacher education for inclusive practices (e.g., Blanton et al, 2014; Pugach & Blanton, 2009; Villegas et al, 2017). We begin with a description of our positionalities as researchers and roles as collaborative teacher educators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Imagination about alternatives to distant private provision begins in the classroom, with attention to the kind of classroom practices outlined by Thomas and Loxley (2022a) and Thomas and Macnab (2022c)—practices such as examination and review of the curriculum, the encouragement of parental involvement and student voice, providing quiet areas and creating chances for social bridging. To enable such changes to be made, far more could be done to examine the possibilities which would unfold if the very substantial moneys currently set aside for private special school placement were disengaged from such provision and made available for use in the mainstream or even in existing LA special school provision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of systematic reviews also means that work which does not meet the inclusion criteria will not be captured in searches or included; however, some of this work might be relevant, but perhaps framed in different ways. Thomas and Macnab (2022) and Bešić (2020), for example, suggest adopting an intersectional framework for inclusion that was not captured by our search strategy; the ideas discussed in these articles were not framed in terms of inclusive pedagogies, so our searches and inclusion criteria excluded them both. However, the articles argue for a different way of identifying students' needs and requirements-and therefore have significant implications for inclusive pedagogies: uniform views of students, embedded in educational policies, narrow the lens through which educators can support learning within the institutional contexts in which they work.…”
Section: Significance and Critical Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%