2018
DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2018.1482013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersectional inclusion for deaf learners: moving beyond General Comment no. 4 on Article 24 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is argued by the WFD, deaf academics, and activists that this can be achieved through the recognition of group rights in terms of access to linguistic and cultural accessibility. In these terms an inclusive society is one that recognises sign language as an equal language (Kusters 2015, Murray et al 2020.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued by the WFD, deaf academics, and activists that this can be achieved through the recognition of group rights in terms of access to linguistic and cultural accessibility. In these terms an inclusive society is one that recognises sign language as an equal language (Kusters 2015, Murray et al 2020.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure deaf children’s access to their rights, there exists a specific requirement in the Convention that they should be educated in languages that are fully accessible to them and in environments that maximize their physical, cognitive, academic and social development. Such educational settings are required to promote deaf children’s linguistic identity and facilitate their learning of a signed language with deaf teachers who are themselves fluent signers 31 …”
Section: Access To Bilingual Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schools are not neutral places; their language ideologies and language policies come from dominant professional and medical viewpoints, affecting relationships with children and families, and asserting the expectation of normalization. Even at an international level, like Murray, Snoddon, De Meulder and Underwood (), despite principles in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNRCPD) to respect sign languages in the education system, the result has been their systematic exclusion.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%