Intersectional Differences in Protective School Assets by Sexuality, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status

Abstract

BackgroundSchool assets—such as connectedness, caring relationships with adults, high behavioral expectations from adults, and meaningful participation—are associated with positive outcomes for adolescents. However, little is known about how school assets differ among adolescents with intersecting marginalized identities.MethodsWe used the 2013‐2014 California Healthy Kids Survey (N = 320,462 students) to examine differences in school assets with respect to sexuality, gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status using adjusted multilevel linear regression models.ResultsSexual minority, gender minority, racial/ethnic minority, and low socioeconomic status adolescents had significantly lower protective school assets. For all outcomes, the differences between sexual minority and heterosexual adolescents were more pronounced among nontransgender girls than nontransgender boys; however, these differences were not consistently present among racial/ethnic minority students. For school connectedness and meaningful participation, differences for racial/ethnic minorities versus white adolescents were more pronounced among nontransgender girls than nontransgender boys. Differences between transgender adolescents and nontransgender boys were more pronounced for white adolescents compared to some other racial/ethnic minority students. Overall, adolescents with certain multiple marginalized identities had lower school assets.ConclusionsInterventions are needed to strengthen school assets among marginalized students, thereby helping mitigate health and education inequities.

Transforming injury prevention for youth (TrIPY): an intersectionality model for youth injury prevention

“…Bisexual women/girls have the highest rate of binge drinking 45. A recent study reported youth with multiple marginalised identities, such as sexual identity, racial identity, cultural identity, gender identity and socioeconomic status (SES), experience stress differently than their peers, leading to injury inequity among diverse youth 46…”

The Role of School Connectedness in Supporting the Health and Well-Being of Youth: Recommendations for School Nurses

“…School connectedness is particularly crucial for youth from marginalized groups. Sexual minority, gender minority, and racial/ethnic minority youth and those from low-socioeconomic status report lower school-related protective factors (including school connectedness), with even higher disparities among youth belonging to multiple marginalized groups (Coulter et al, 2021). The pandemic has negatively affected the mental health of LGBTQIA+ youth due to a lack of opportunities to socialize and build supportive, identity-affirming relationships that might bolster feelings of belongingness at school (Fish et al, 2020).…”

Providing Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Nonbinary, and Queer Adolescents With Nurturance, Trustworthiness, and Safety: Protocol for Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Design

“…Unfortunately, sexual and gender minority youths are more likely than their heterosexual peers to lack supportive adults at school, have lower school connectedness, and be exposed to bullying [5,6,25,26,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]]. An intervention that trains school staff to better understand and support sexual and gender minority youths and engage in positive bystander behaviors that protect them from bullying exposure may reduce health disparities among them.…”