1994
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600010013x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrow Cultivation to Reduce Herbicide Use in Corn following Alfalfa without Tillage

Abstract: Information on integrated weed management systems for conservation tillage systems is needed so that producers can minimize the environmental impacts of crop production without sacrificing profitability. Our objective was to evaluate reduced levels of preemergence herbicides in combination with interrow cultivation for weed control in corn (Zea mays L.) planted into an untilled, deteriorated alfalfa stand treated with glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] the previous fall. Fall application of glyphosate con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(11 reference statements)
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best overall weed control, however, was typically achieved with the herbicide‐intensive treatments (Treatments 1–4) with more than a 98% reduction in weed biomass compared to the weedy check treatments. These results agree with previous research showing that the high residue cultivator (with and without other mechanical weed control operations) is not consistently equivalent to herbicide‐intensive systems (Eadie et al, 1992; Buhler et al, 1994, 1995; Paarlberg et al, 1998; Hanna et al, 2000) and will likely need to be supplemented with additional management tactics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best overall weed control, however, was typically achieved with the herbicide‐intensive treatments (Treatments 1–4) with more than a 98% reduction in weed biomass compared to the weedy check treatments. These results agree with previous research showing that the high residue cultivator (with and without other mechanical weed control operations) is not consistently equivalent to herbicide‐intensive systems (Eadie et al, 1992; Buhler et al, 1994, 1995; Paarlberg et al, 1998; Hanna et al, 2000) and will likely need to be supplemented with additional management tactics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…High residue inter‐row cultivators are also commercially available, which are modified versions of a standard inter‐row cultivator designed to handle high residue and no‐till conditions (Springman et al, 1989; Bowman, 1997; Paarlberg et al, 1998; Hanna et al, 2000). Previous studies have reported that high residue cultivation alone did not typically provide adequate weed control, but the addition of banded residual herbicides over the crop row provided much needed in‐row weed control in these systems (Eadie et al, 1992; Buhler et al, 1994, 1995). We believed there was further opportunity to improve the weed control efficacy of these systems by integrating the high residue cultivator with the vertical coulter/rotary harrow and/or high residue rotary hoe.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultivating no-tillage corn without herbicides provided 62-79% weed control when following a previous corn crop (Buhler et al, 1995). Two cultivations without herbicide provided 63-82% control of broadleaf populations, but one cultivation gave 36-56% broadleaf control for no-tillage com following a previous alfalfa crop (Buhler et al, 1994).…”
Section: Weed Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultivation, alone, often does not provide adequate weed control, but the combination of cultivation plus banded herbicide in the crop row has controlled weeds and permitted production of crop yields equivalent to those obtained with broadcast herbicides (Buhler et al, 1994(Buhler et al, , 1995Hanna et al, 2000;Hartzler et al, 1993;Mulder and Doll, 1993;Mt. Pleasant et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With banding, application rates and costs are one‐half to one‐third of conventional broadcast applications. Weeds between the treated bands are controlled by mechanical cultivation (Buhler et al, 1994). In addition to reducing application rates, banding and cultivation also affect herbicide transport through changes in weed growth and surface hydrology including runoff (Hansen et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%