2018
DOI: 10.3390/rel9020058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrogating the Comparative Method: Whither, Why, and How?1

Abstract: This essay seeks to illuminate the problematics, methods, and dynamics of comparison by interrogating how certain analytical categories in the study of religion, such as scripture and the body, can be fruitfully reimagined through a comparative analysis of their Hindu and Jewish instantiations. I consider a range of issues that are critical to any productive comparative study, and I reflect more specifically on the principal components of my own comparative method in light of Oliver Freiberger's analytical fra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Masuzawa, the formation of the discourse on world religions is a prime example of how comparing, othering, and the naturalisation of highly selective classifications are intertwined. See, for instance, Holdrege (2000Holdrege ( , 2018 and Freiberger (2018Freiberger ( , 2019. Positioning his work beyond postmodernist and postcolonial critiques, Freiberger (2019, 196) asserts that these critiques "have helped to sharpen our methodological awareness, but they do not have the potential to call comparison into question in a fundamental way."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Masuzawa, the formation of the discourse on world religions is a prime example of how comparing, othering, and the naturalisation of highly selective classifications are intertwined. See, for instance, Holdrege (2000Holdrege ( , 2018 and Freiberger (2018Freiberger ( , 2019. Positioning his work beyond postmodernist and postcolonial critiques, Freiberger (2019, 196) asserts that these critiques "have helped to sharpen our methodological awareness, but they do not have the potential to call comparison into question in a fundamental way."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"post-postmodern" or "post-postcolonial" approaches (Holdrege 2000(Holdrege , 87, 2018Kimmich 2017, 140-41). Comparing, as the argument goes, can lend itself to the reflexive and relational turn both in ontology and epistemology, devising an "ethics of comparison" and implementing a "politics of recognition."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%