“…Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), a special class of crystalline porous materials constructed with metals ions or clusters interlinked by organic ligands, have attracted the attention of a large number of multidisciplinary researchers owing to their potential implementation in forefront technologies and scientific advancements. − The chemical versatility of these materials has boosted the fabrication of different MOF structures with bespoke physicochemical properties. Indeed, nowadays it is possible to design photoactive MOFs on demand, , which have been used in different fields of photonics spanning from sensing, optoelectronic applications, cell imaging, and photocatalysis. − Due to their large surface area, ordered porous structure, tunable organic bridging linker/metal clusters, higher thermal stability, and better water tolerance than most of other MOFs, Zr-based MOFs isostructural to the UiO family, have garnered great interest for their potential as photocatalysts in different reactions. − However, the UiO-type MOFs are mainly constituted by d 0 metals such as Zr or Hf, whose binding energy is too low, and consequently, the overlap between their orbitals and the π*-orbitals of the organic linkers is very inefficient. , This mismatch in the orbital levels hinders an efficient generation of long-lived charge-separated states (CSSs) in the photoexcited MOFs, which are the cornerstone of the photocatalytic reactions, and therefore reduces the photocatalytic activity of MOFs like Zr-UiO or Hf-UiO . To circumvent this drawback, it has been proposed that doping the Zr clusters with Ce in UiO-isostructural MOFs may enhance the photocatalytic activity as a result of a more efficient ligand-to-cluster charge transfer (LCCT) process upon photoexcitation of the organic linkers. − The enhancement of the LCCT event is caused by the low-lying empty 4f orbitals of Ce 4+ that better overlap with the π*-orbitals of the organic linkers .…”