Interrelation between the stressed state of rocks and their properties

Turchaninov, I. A.

doi:10.1007/bf02499399

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…e second is based on the laboratory testing and theoretical analysis, including the strength-stress ratio criteria and energy criteria. e strength-stress ratio criteria [8][9][10][11] have widely been used in many tunneling projects, but the prediction results did not meet the requirements of tunneling, especially in the tectonic stress zone. e main reason is because the strength of rock used in the strength-stress ratio criteria was obtained from the laboratory axial tests, and the influence of the in situ stress on the strength of rock was not considered.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy Release Analysis of a Severe Rockburst in a Headrace Tunnel Crossing a Tectonic Stress Zone

Tian

Chen

et al. 2019

Shock and Vibration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When tunneling in a hard and brittle rock mass within a tectonic stress zone, dynamic failure of rock mass-rockburst may occur. Considering the occurrence of rockburst is generally induced by a sudden release of storage elastic energy, a numerical analysis based on the geotechnical conditions of the headrace tunnels of the Neelum–Jhelum hydroelectric project was carried out to investigate the variations of the storage elastic energy of surrounding rock mass during excavation in the tectonic stress zone. As expected, the numerical results show that the storage elastic energy concentration zones is elliptical around the tunnel due to the influence of the tectonic stress field and that the long axis of the ellipse is perpendicular to the orientation of the maximum principal stress of the tectonic stress. Furthermore, the calculated storage energy concentration zone is consistent with the locations of blasting overbreak in the tunnel. Rockburst predictions were carried out using the strength-stress ratio and energy criteria to identify the applicability of the criteria in a tectonic stress zone. The comparisons between the predictions and the field observations show that the strength-stress ratio criteria based on the uniaxial tests do not consider the influence of the tectonic stress on the strength of the rock. These criteria overpredict the extent of the blasting pits in the tectonic stress zone. However, the energy criteria based on the energy conversion of unloading confining pressure tests are able to reflect the influence of the tectonic stress, and the prediction results are more close to the field observations.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%