1991
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/71.6.465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrater Reliability of Videotaped Observational Gait-Analysis Assessments

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the interrater reliability of videotaped observational gait-analysis (VOGA) assessments. Fifty-four licensed physical therapists with varying amounts of clinical experience served as raters. Three patients with rheumatoid arthritis who demonstrated an abnormal gait pattern served as subjects for the videotape. The raters analyzed each patient's most severely involved knee during the four subphases of stance for the kinematic variables of knee flexion and genu valgum. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
128
1
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
128
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A contributing factor could be that the examiners in our study were familiar with the test method since they used the tests in their clinical work and had undergone a training session prior to the assessments. The importance of experience and standardization has also been pointed out by others [6,11]. Notably, there was a lower agreement between occasions 1 and 2 than between Examiners A and B, especially on patients' injured side ( Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…A contributing factor could be that the examiners in our study were familiar with the test method since they used the tests in their clinical work and had undergone a training session prior to the assessments. The importance of experience and standardization has also been pointed out by others [6,11]. Notably, there was a lower agreement between occasions 1 and 2 than between Examiners A and B, especially on patients' injured side ( Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Eastlack et al 10 identified that a lack of standardization of rater training had led to poor rater reliability in their study. We, therefore, provided the same indepth training to all of our raters, giving them ample opportunity to practice and to ask questions prior to starting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We built our simple approach on the foundational work of other groups, 5,10,23,38 which was a key factor in achieving high rater agreement. Specifically, we developed explicit rating criteria incorporating easily discernible anatomical landmarks (the patella and the first toe), based on recommendations by Chmielewski et al, 5 who had poor results with more ambiguous rating criteria such as "good," "fair," and "poor."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu çalışmalarda basma döneminin salınım dönemine göre daha değişken olduğu gösterilmiştir. 4,10,17 GYA çalışmaları karşılaştırıldığında, ilerleticili video analiz yöntemi ile yürüme deviyasyonlarının saptanma kapasitesinin yükseltilebileceği sonucu çıkmaktadır. …”
Section: Geçerlilikunclassified