2009
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrater and intermethod reliability of default mode network selection

Abstract: There has been a growing interest in the neuroimaging community regarding resting state data (i.e., passive mental activity) and the subsequent activation of the so-called default mode network (DMN). Although this network was originally characterized by a pattern of deactivation during active cognitive states, more recent applications of data-driven techniques such as independent component analysis (ICA) have permitted the analysis of brain activation during extended periods of truly passive mental activity. H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
108
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To establish this we employed a repeated measures ANOVA as implemented in SPM with group as a between subject factor, ER and stimulus type (target and standard) as within subject factors. Clusters were retained in the mask if they were also consistent with DMN areas reported in previous studies (Franco et al, 2009, Laird et al, 2009). Three such clusters were identified at a false discovery ratecorrected p level of 0.05 (cluster forming threshold p<0.001) and included in the mask (see Figure 2 and Table 2 The beta values from the DMN mask for all regressors in the first level model were extracted using MARSBAR software (Brett, Anton, Valabregue, & Poline, 2002).…”
Section: Procedures and Task Designmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To establish this we employed a repeated measures ANOVA as implemented in SPM with group as a between subject factor, ER and stimulus type (target and standard) as within subject factors. Clusters were retained in the mask if they were also consistent with DMN areas reported in previous studies (Franco et al, 2009, Laird et al, 2009). Three such clusters were identified at a false discovery ratecorrected p level of 0.05 (cluster forming threshold p<0.001) and included in the mask (see Figure 2 and Table 2 The beta values from the DMN mask for all regressors in the first level model were extracted using MARSBAR software (Brett, Anton, Valabregue, & Poline, 2002).…”
Section: Procedures and Task Designmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We thus applied ICA using our predefined DMN regions to identify them independently as a preparatory step to derive specific group-level spatial maps to feed into the dual regression. They were carefully chosen according to Buckner et al [22], and constrained within existing independent DMN templates [75,76], containing the bilateral ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) (Brodmann area (BA) 10; we condensed the vmPFC to BA 10 excluding BA 32 and 24 and verified the anatomical accuracy with a current DMN template by Smith et al [76] resulting in our mask including parts of the superior and middle frontal gyrus (but will refer to this hub as the vmPFC for the remainder of the paper), PCC (BA 23, 31), inferior parietal lobule (IPL) (BA 39,40), and in addition the RSC (BA 29, 30), and both hippocampi. Conforming to the method by Franco et al [75], we identified these nodes using BAs in the Wake Forest University Pickatlas toolbox [77], which is based on histological and cytoarchitectonical observations and therefore allows for a functional and anatomical accurate selection of DMN nodes of interest (Fig.…”
Section: Data Preprocessing On Group Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional coupling between the left vmPFC and the left PCC (F (2,75) Table 2). Post-hoc analyses revealed a significantly lower positive coupling between the left vmPFC and left PCC in prodro- (Fig.…”
Section: Dmn Node Coupling Between Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The DMN was identified through a voxel-wise correlation with the DMN template supplied in GIFT. 21 Between-group comparisons of RS FC were tested using factorial models, which were explicitly masked with the binarized DMN mask extracted from each one-sample t test using Marsbar. 22 Correlations between DMN RS FC abnormalities vs clinical variables, neuropsychological scores, and other MRI variables were assessed using linear regression models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%