2023
DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interprofessional Case Conference Enhances Group Learning and the Quality, Safety, Value, and Equity of Team-Based Care

Abstract: Introduction:Patients seeking treatment for complex conditions require coordinated care from interprofessional clinicians. Collaborative engagement in an interprofessional community of practice is crucial to the collective competence of a team and the provision of high-quality, safe health care leading to improved patient outcomes. The objective of this descriptive, cross-sectional study was to describe interprofessional communication, coordination, and collaboration of participants in an integrated practice u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that MOOC courses as part of continuous medical education were significantly correlated with factors such as contribution of MOOC courses to primary care services, age, MOOC as group activity, better expression of participants and self-learning (Tables 6,7) , (6,11,19,20). Along with socioeconomic differences, there may be cognitive-affective differences among all kind of students that contribute to educational inequality (21,22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that MOOC courses as part of continuous medical education were significantly correlated with factors such as contribution of MOOC courses to primary care services, age, MOOC as group activity, better expression of participants and self-learning (Tables 6,7) , (6,11,19,20). Along with socioeconomic differences, there may be cognitive-affective differences among all kind of students that contribute to educational inequality (21,22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%