2013
DOI: 10.4324/9780203385579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretive Approaches to Global Climate Governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What became known as the climate justice movement emerged out of this anticarbon market movement and broadened the frame of reference for contesting climate governance and understanding it in political economy terms Methmann, Rothe, & Stephan, 2013). Out of it has emerged movements against oil pipelines and the divestment movement (Bratman, Brunette, Shelly, & Nicholson, 2016;Rowe, Dempsey, & Gibbs, 2016).…”
Section: Climate Change and Anticapitalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What became known as the climate justice movement emerged out of this anticarbon market movement and broadened the frame of reference for contesting climate governance and understanding it in political economy terms Methmann, Rothe, & Stephan, 2013). Out of it has emerged movements against oil pipelines and the divestment movement (Bratman, Brunette, Shelly, & Nicholson, 2016;Rowe, Dempsey, & Gibbs, 2016).…”
Section: Climate Change and Anticapitalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the additionality of emissions reduction in Contents lists available at ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol many offset projects (e.g. industrial gas offsets) cannot be guaranteed, meaning that offset is per se a zero-sum game, at best (Methmann et al, 2013). Furthermore, offsets may discourage and delay domestic activities and risk locking the EU into carbon-intensive infrastructure, rendering its ambitious long-term emissions target too expensive to achieve (Bows et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, trusting politicians to manage the ecological crisis is at a low level. Against this background, more and more actors enhance the development of techno-fixestechnological solutions that promise to solve symptoms of complex problems without changing social structures (Methmann et al, 2013). In this context, CCS technologies are of particular interest as they are based on the established centralized fossil energy infrastructure (IPCC, 2005, p. 12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%